• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Churchill Knight & Boox clients being investigated as Managed Service Companies

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Lotok View Post

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Untitled.jpg
Views:	1294
Size:	12.8 KB
ID:	4313075
    "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
    - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

    Comment


      HMRC have pushed dates back as their council got the dates wrong.

      They are scrambling..maybe

      Surely they have to stop the interest accruing now.
      Last edited by dayd08; 12 August 2025, 16:28.

      Comment


        Originally posted by dayd08 View Post
        HMRC have pushed dates back as their council got the dates wrong.

        They are scrambling..maybe

        Surely they have to stop the interest accruing now.
        This is only for Churchill Knight, still no dates for Boox yet.
        Last edited by rdw1970; 13 August 2025, 08:08.

        Comment


          I've managed to settle my case with the HMRC, I thought I'd share my experience.

          My first two years were removed from the investigation as I didn't pay myself much from the business, which meant I didn't meet either 61B(1)(b) or 61B(1)(c). Only the final year came under consideration.

          HMRC consider pension contributions to be 'payments to the individual' for the purposes of meeting 61B(1)(b) but do not include these contributions in the DEP calculation as they do not consider them as 'general earnings from employment'. Allowable business expenses were also deductible from the DEP total.

          Once the DEP calculation was complete, I had to submit separate claims for corporation and dividend tax overpayments. However, I didn't have to pay the outstanding bill and wait for separate overpayment refunds, rather the overpayments were included in the calculation for the final outstanding payment.

          No penalties were applied.

          During the tax year in question my total income didn't exceed the higher tax rate threshold, I didn't split dividends with anyone else and I made significant pension contributions. So my personal circumstances meant that the overpayments pretty much wiped out the total outstanding tax and NI bill.

          Being honest, once I made it known to the HMRC that I would be willing to come to a figure and settle, the individual officer I dealt with was quite reasonable and we resolved the matter fairly amicably.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Bruce88 View Post
            I've managed to settle my case with the HMRC, I thought I'd share my experience.

            My first two years were removed from the investigation as I didn't pay myself much from the business, which meant I didn't meet either 61B(1)(b) or 61B(1)(c). Only the final year came under consideration.

            HMRC consider pension contributions to be 'payments to the individual' for the purposes of meeting 61B(1)(b) but do not include these contributions in the DEP calculation as they do not consider them as 'general earnings from employment'. Allowable business expenses were also deductible from the DEP total.

            Once the DEP calculation was complete, I had to submit separate claims for corporation and dividend tax overpayments. However, I didn't have to pay the outstanding bill and wait for separate overpayment refunds, rather the overpayments were included in the calculation for the final outstanding payment.

            No penalties were applied.

            During the tax year in question my total income didn't exceed the higher tax rate threshold, I didn't split dividends with anyone else and I made significant pension contributions. So my personal circumstances meant that the overpayments pretty much wiped out the total outstanding tax and NI bill.

            Being honest, once I made it known to the HMRC that I would be willing to come to a figure and settle, the individual officer I dealt with was quite reasonable and we resolved the matter fairly amicably.

            What did they apply in regards to interest on top of the amount they were claiming from you and what interest was given on the overpayments. Was there a difference?

            Comment


              Originally posted by Lotok View Post


              What did they apply in regards to interest on top of the amount they were claiming from you and what interest was given on the overpayments. Was there a difference?
              TBH I haven't received the final calculation to see how they applied interest payments. It was sent to my agent and hasn't been forwarded to me yet. I just received a final amount which tied in close to my calculations and as previously stated the overpayments pretty much covered the tax and NI owed so I accepted it to allow the case to be closed. The remaining balance was negligible.

              The process was I received the revised calculations for tax and NI owed without the addition of interest payments. You have 30 days to appeal this calculation after which this settlement becomes final. After the 30 days you can submit separate claims for both CT and dividend tax over payment relief, which you calculate. These overpayment reliefs were also submitted without the addition of interest payments.

              I assume interest payments are only applied to the outstanding balance once HMRC have verified the overpayment calculation. Once I receive this final calculation from my agent I'll confirm.

              Comment


                It makes you wonder how much HMRC actually stand to claw back from this raid.

                I suspect a tiny amount compared to dodgy schemes.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by woody1 View Post
                  It makes you wonder how much HMRC actually stand to claw back from this raid.

                  I suspect a tiny amount compared to dodgy schemes.
                  As others have previously said, it's not just about the money. A tribunal win for HMRC would make it easier for them to pursue other cases in the future and would create a strong deterrent to other contractors who follow the low salary/high dividend model with similar accountancy firms to Boox and CK.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X