So Felicitas are in court, and they "choose" not to prove that they:
A) Own the the "debt"
B) The "debt" is legitimate and the paperwork they have confirms this and backs up their claim
Now why on earth would they do that........it would be the one thing they could have done which would have proven at least some of their claims and no doubt persuaded many people to pay up..............it would seem they're not quite as confident as they claim.
If anyone is in contact with Felicitas, they should be asking them for the case number. It's a public record, so they cannot refuse on the basis of data protection or anything else. If they refuse to supply the case number, then that speaks volumes.
A) Own the the "debt"
B) The "debt" is legitimate and the paperwork they have confirms this and backs up their claim
Now why on earth would they do that........it would be the one thing they could have done which would have proven at least some of their claims and no doubt persuaded many people to pay up..............it would seem they're not quite as confident as they claim.
If anyone is in contact with Felicitas, they should be asking them for the case number. It's a public record, so they cannot refuse on the basis of data protection or anything else. If they refuse to supply the case number, then that speaks volumes.
Comment