I was pretty worried for the last few years as I didn't read into this much. My only source of info was lurking on here. But as I look more and more into the legislation set out and things like constute barred etc the more confidence I have. Even simple things like on the financial ombudsman site it says agreements need to be signed etc for things to be enforceable, further reinforce my confidence despite people saying "If you have recieved money it counts as an agreement" - not sure that will stand up in court. These clowns know the chasing will fail if it goes to court. In my case they have no agreements signed and nor have I interacted or paid anything to them. I have potentially multiple avenues to go down to get them off my back BUT I will be contacting the groups first before I start sending out the template letters requesting them for proof . I will send the SAR request for sure. I also think I have legal assistance I can get through work
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Things about to get very serious and much more real? / Felicitas Letters
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Be careful - don’t assume the consumer credit act or similar applies in cases where the money was lent to you within an employer employee relationship.Originally posted by looperevil View PostI was pretty worried for the last few years as I didn't read into this much. My only source of info was lurking on here. But as I look more and more into the legislation set out and things like constute barred etc the more confidence I have. Even simple things like on the financial ombudsman site it says agreements need to be signed etc for things to be enforceable, further reinforce my confidence despite people saying "If you have recieved money it counts as an agreement" - not sure that will stand up in court. These clowns know the chasing will fail if it goes to court. In my case they have no agreements signed and nor have I interacted or paid anything to them. I have potentially multiple avenues to go down to get them off my back BUT I will be contacting the groups first before I start sending out the template letters requesting them for proof . I will send the SAR request for sure. I also think I have legal assistance I can get through work
and remember that just accepting the money may have been enough to create the loan so you do need to tread very carefully here.
Ask for the SAR they have on you but remember not to sign any letter yourself in case they decide to “recreate the paperwork”.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
I am not assuming anything. And it is up to them to prove in court that I am liable. And your second point is speculation and assuming it is indeed a loan, then the statute barred could be invoked. If you think about the silly offers they made us like "pay 5%" to write off the loan - it was all a trap to make it seem like a loan. And if you make any payment, the 6 year timer resets again or even if you acknowledge the loan amount. I recall they sent a link to some portal for us to log in and confirm the amount of the loans - I always thought that was bizarre given surely you as the "creditor" would know what is liable? I never went near that portal but unfortunately at least one person did on this forum.Originally posted by eek View Post
Be careful - don’t assume the consumer credit act or similar applies in cases where the money was lent to you within an employer employee relationship.
and remember that just accepting the money may have been enough to create the loan so you do need to tread very carefully here.
Ask for the SAR they have on you but remember not to sign any letter yourself in case they decide to “recreate the paperwork”.
I think we have more aces up our sleeve than they do if it went to court. I could be wrong though!Last edited by looperevil; 26 February 2023, 13:37.Comment
-
So they said they would email me all their documentation but I refused to give them my email address so they said they would post it. I asked for it to be sent recorded so we both have proof of postage.Originally posted by PJSMITH1980 View Post
what was their response when you asked for all the information from them ?
Below is the letter I received from them.
Comment
-
I have thus far completely ignored this until I called Town & Country back. Will me speaking to them have reset the statue of limitation?Comment
-
How can they collect under the Loan Charge, that would be due to HMRC, if it was due? And how can they collect on behalf of Felicitas as they are purporting to have sold the alleged debt on to W28. I smell something fishy, and I'm not talking about the contents of Baldricks apple crumble. I didn't think it was possible, but this outfit looks like a shakier peg than Gladstones. The signatory of the letter still looks a little bit wet behind the ears. (7) Dan Bland | LinkedIn.Originally posted by MrsPatricia View Post
So they said they would email me all their documentation but I refused to give them my email address so they said they would post it. I asked for it to be sent recorded so we both have proof of postage.
Below is the letter I received from them.
Also, why couldn't Felicitas do anything to enforce their supposed claims through Gladstones that they had to change over to using T&C?Last edited by hudson; 27 February 2023, 14:33.Comment
-
There is at least a theoretical possibility that HMRC have raised an assessment on the original “employer”, and they are seeking to “recoup” this - whether that’s really the case is another matter entirely..Originally posted by hudson View Post
How can they collect under the Loan Charge, that would be due to HMRC, if it was due? And how can they collect on behalf of Felicitas as they are purporting to have sold the alleged debt on to W28. I smell something fishy, and I'm not talking about the contents of Baldricks apple crumble. I didn't think it was possible, but this outfit looks like a shakier peg than Gladstones. The signatory of the letter still looks a little bit wet behind the ears. (7) Dan Bland | LinkedInComment
-
No. Speaking to them won't have. Only admitting there is a loan you are liable for in writing and/or making them a payment would reset it.Originally posted by MrsPatricia View PostI have thus far completely ignored this until I called Town & Country back. Will me speaking to them have reset the statue of limitation?
Comment
-
I have spoken to WTT and have a call with them. I am likely to be instructing them to be honest but lets see how I get on with my call.Comment
-
No chance. No point spinning theories like this as it spooks people for no reason. I have already spoken to HMRC but the person I spoke to had clue what I was talking about even though I called the right Contractor Loan helpline. I want them to start taking some ownership given there is a bunch of comedians out there claiming to be recovering debts for a Loan Charge. I will try them again tomorrow.Originally posted by Chevalier View Post
There is at least a theoretical possibility that HMRC have raised an assessment on the original “employer”, and they are seeking to “recoup” this - whether that’s really the case is another matter entirely..Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment