IQ Consultants, Felicitas Solutions, ECS Trustees - loan repayment demands

[DealorNoDeal]

Not sure what you mean about letters not being addressed personally. Every correspondence I ever received from HMRC regarding scheme usage was very much addressed to me personally and referenced the scheme (sanzar) I had used. Of course there were the generic parts in it, but it was tailored directly at me.

I spoke with my tax adviser yesterday about a different issue and bought this up. His view was that in order for HMRC to come back for another bite after issuing either a closure notice or a determination, would only ever happen if they have very strong evidence that the numbers agreed were entirely wrong. Even then, his view was that they would need to officially reopen the enquiry/determination/assessment etc before they could request any information from the taxpapyer. Basically, they can't just send letters asking for information relating to a tax enquiry that's closed.

His view was that he would push HMRC to explain exactly why they are requesting this information which has already been supplied to them once, years after the issue was resolved, and if they have reason to now question the settlement, then they need to share that information openly.

For what it's worth, I would NEVER....and i mean NEVER engage directly with HMRC regarding anything. I've always used a registered tax adviser to deal with them. In my opinion HMRC case workers are far less likely to try it on with a tax specialist then with the individual tax payer. HMRC know that the veiled threats which they outline in their letters carry zero weight with an adviser, and they know that the advisers understand tax laws and process as well as HMRC do, and in some cases even better. Equally, they know that any evidence that is given to HMRC has also been reviewed by the tax adviser too.

I've seen numerous cases, over the years, of HMRC trying it on with individual scheme users.

An alternative to using a tax advisor, or accountant, is to complain to your Member of Parliament. Even the threat, of complaining to your MP, is often enough to get HMRC to back off.

[Sick of it]

It states Fiscus Management on the settlement email and then when you check who Fiscus Management are on Companies House it states the creator and only person of this account is Andrew William Thompson. It also shows that Fiscus was previously known as DOR resolution Ltd to which he was up to these same tactics. DOR was being questioned as the new THL at the time.

It seems these numerous attempts to con hard working contractors to part with their money (including the original so-called umbrella companies that received a percentage of our earnings to deliver nothing other than years of HMRC hassle and avoidable interest) may all be driven by Andrew Thompson. As Mr Thompson is also a director of Winchester (who were connected to Darwin), IQ and DOR and now we see that any money paid in response to the Felicitas demands actually goes into his Fiscus bank account.

[Wtaf]

It seems these numerous attempts to con hard working contractors to part with their money (including the original so-called umbrella companies that received a percentage of our earnings to deliver nothing other than years of HMRC hassle and avoidable interest) may all be driven by Andrew Thompson. As Mr Thompson is also a director of Winchester (who were connected to Darwin), IQ and DOR and now we see that any money paid in response to the Felicitas demands actually goes into his Fiscus bank account.

Exactly and the argument I've posed to my MP (seriously EVERYONE write to yours detailing the evidence on this thread, etc) is these scumbags (please don't address him as Mr, it shows common decency), created this mess and now they are profiting off it? I think they've made a mistake, they've gotten too confident and thought their money could shield them. Epstein probably thought that too. Tick tok old man...

[creativity]

Andrew Thompson of ************

[Fred Bloggs]

Andrew Thompson of

More than likely to be an unoccupied rental property, I'd think. It would be if I was that bloke.

[creativity]

More than likely to be an unoccupied rental property, I'd think. It would be if I was that bloke.

Not so sure, I think he moved there in 2002. It's either his or his daughters address.

[MrO666]

I know many people are struggling with this at the moment, but personally I don't think it's wise to post anyone's address (regardless what they've possibly done) on a public forum.

[Wtaf]

It's displayed publicly on Companies House. There is no 'may have done' he IS Fiscus Management Limited who ARE in bed with Felicitas.

[Tezz]

His address IS in the public domain anyway, and available to anyone via Google or Companies House or via Govt websites.....

[Albert49]

Correspondence Address

His address IS in the public domain anyway, and available to anyone via Google or Companies House or via Govt websites.....

It is not neccesarily where he lives, it is listed as a correspondence address, If I look for Lord Sugar I get: Amshold House, Goldings Hill, Loughton, England, IG10 2RW , but I doubt that he lives there...

Alan Michael SUGAR - Personal Appointments (free information from Companies House)