Originally posted by GregRickshaw
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Overdrawn Capital Account Scheme (Aston Mae / Glen Mae / Procorre)
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
"I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank... -
Originally posted by cojak View Post
No Greg, it really isn’t - they are much more embedded than that. Procorre sucked up contractor’s Ltd’s and basically assimilated them (into an LLP), like the Borg.
If it's confusing HMRC, I'm not surprised.Scoots still says that Apr 2020 didn't mark the start of a new stock bull market.Comment
-
Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post
I must admit, I can't get my head around this scheme. I presume it was designed to save tax but I can't fathom it out.
If it's confusing HMRC, I'm not surprised.
People on the ODC arrangement who didn't go through with the acquisition, presumably felt safe as they had paid taxes on the allocated profits, with some people actually saying they ended up paying more than if they had stuck to just paying themselves via dividends etc.
It seems the whole arrangement was more a tax deferment scheme than tax avoidance. My accountant at the time suggested I would effectively be tax neutral, which is why I didn't worry. Seems I was an idiot and my accountant didn't know what he was talking about though.Comment
-
Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post
I must admit, I can't get my head around this scheme. I presume it was designed to save tax but I can't fathom it out.
If it's confusing HMRC, I'm not surprised."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post
I must admit, I can't get my head around this scheme. I presume it was designed to save tax but I can't fathom it out.
If it's confusing HMRC, I'm not surprised.Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Originally posted by mightyspur View Post
People on the ODC arrangement who didn't go through with the acquisition, presumably felt safe as they had paid taxes on the allocated profits, with some people actually saying they ended up paying more than if they had stuck to just paying themselves via dividends etc.
It was sold to victims as a tax efficient way of paying yourself (via a trust or ODC), while they collected 17% off the top of your earnings as a fee for running it (83% retention!). All they had to do is offer a few value add services on top which were pretty much just introduction services to mortgage brokers, or recruitment agents and bobs your uncle.
Since the scheme introductions were made by third parties they could then claim ignorance that this was never a tax dodge. Handy for them.
The moment I got my first Section 9A letter from HMRC in 2015 it dawned on me that I'd been had, and would eventually have no leg to stand on, nor would the people who peddled this to me have to cough up anything from Singapore or Switzerland, so started saving up for all the tax I knew they would come for. Thankfully their own glacial progress bought me some time ahead of the loan charge, but I still have another two years of my TTP arrangement to go.
The purchase of my LTD felt like some kind of hail mary play from them the moment I heard about it, and ran a mile when they suggested it to me. I feel sorry for anyone who compounded their personal tax affairs with that of their LTD company on top of it.Last edited by nucastle; 29 March 2023, 10:02.Comment
-
Originally posted by mightyspur View Post
Procorre Legal do appear to be fairly useless in terms of trying to get hold of them, but I don't think they have closed. I think they are just overwhelmed with the number of enquiries they are dealing with. It seems impossible to get hold of anyone on the phone for example. I can only suggest you keep hassling them for the response, because they usually send their replies out of the blue past the arbitrary deadline imposed by HMRC, but they have always sent me something, despite emailing them every single day leading up to the deadline, not that those replies do any good in terms of how HMRC view things.
I have only spoken to WTT and it would appear that they know what they are talking about and even have a section on their website that references the Procorre scheme directly. I am sure there are other advisors available though
Speaking to WTT next week - looking forward to some simple honest advice... keep you all posted.Comment
-
Originally posted by frontmen242 View Post
I would just like to say after emailing Procorre Legal for a 2nd time yesterday, I got a reply saying they will respond before the deadline and drafting the response they probably give to everyone, typically that's just under a month away so they like to keep it all last minute... never mind my nerves... also that they have a huge backlog I wonder why? I'm guessing its a case of watch this space....
Speaking to WTT next week - looking forward to some simple honest advice... keep you all posted.Comment
-
Has Proccorre given an explanation to anyone. People have different deadlines and as far as I can tell, no one has received a response from Procorre, other than the generic email stating they will respond before the end date.
Does signing the LLP agreement with Procorre hold any value? I thought that under LLP, the responsibility is shared but the tone of the letters from HMRC indicate that the employee and their LTD company are liable.Comment
-
I am a 1st time poster on here having received an HMRC disguised loan demand yesterday. I did 1 contract for Procorre in 2014 for a relatively low value over 6 months now I have a tax demand for nearly 3x the value of the money I received - surely this can't be correct/legal etc. I have a call with WTT tomorrow and seeing this thread they seem to be the people who are looking into this for a number of people. My accountant is holding me back from talking to Procorre just now. I have a couple of questions 1 - Has anyone on here actually reached a resolution with HMRC 2 - I don't fully understand the loan value as I never received this money can someone explain ? . I was a sole-trader so didn't sell my business to them thankfully. Many thanksComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment