In the past I used to apply for London roles and constantly get asked if I had worked in London in the past. Usually agents would then dismiss my application on the basis I was a) outside of London and b) had never worked in London before.
I have noticed an increasing trend of agencies asking if I would be willing to work in London and quoting higher rates than I had previously applied for. This time however, I keep explaining that London just doesn't work financially and that for an extra £100/day it was pointless to even consider London.
Was just wondering if anybody else has experienced the same or if it is just in my field? Also is it the case that supply for these contracts must come from within Greater London or will they have to increase the rates to make it financially viable for contractors like myself to consider working there?
I have noticed an increasing trend of agencies asking if I would be willing to work in London and quoting higher rates than I had previously applied for. This time however, I keep explaining that London just doesn't work financially and that for an extra £100/day it was pointless to even consider London.
Was just wondering if anybody else has experienced the same or if it is just in my field? Also is it the case that supply for these contracts must come from within Greater London or will they have to increase the rates to make it financially viable for contractors like myself to consider working there?
Comment