Originally posted by Old Greg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Family cars....
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Second vote here for the Subaru Legacy - good carOriginally posted by SimonMac View PostHave a look at the Subaru Legacy, very practical but also fun to drive and looks good too
Though from your original list the BMW gets a vote for me too, I beleive they do a 4wd version of the 3 Series now too, its on my list for whenever i swap my Subaru (few years off)Politicians are wonderfull people, as long as they stay away from things they don't understand, like working for a living!Comment
-
What you say is true except it really does have a lot more power than you expect, even getting from 80 - 90 mph aint that difficult. I think the 2.0 would be a lot more fun but as it stands I am very happy with my purchase in terms of a commuter car doing 120 miles a day. Will keep for 2 years and then trade in for one with adaptive cruise (comes as standard in the same model for the mk7).Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
Not quite what you were expecting hey. I would have gone for a bigger engine though, won't be as economical when you are having to put you foot down to get some speed up with that BHP. Small engines do not necessarily mean they are more economical. Might be faster than old diesels but still not that much grunt in that. Solid car all round though and meets all the criteria you had.
I recommend you give it a try as I was a bit worried about this when I bought it but pleasantly surprised.Last edited by NorthWestPerm2Contr; 3 April 2014, 11:11.Comment
-
Kept my old VW for 4 years so I don't think I am that quick at changing vehicles! Will not be keeping this for that long though, as said above, 2 years then get another one. 3 year old cars have already taken their major hit in terms of depreciation, current car costs over 20k new.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostHe's selling it on Monday and getting another one.Comment
-
A 1.6l diesel golf was not on your list.
Hope you've bought a good one and have a decent length commute as the DPF stories are far too common.....merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
it's got 25,000 miles on the clock and I am averaging over 55 mph over a 120 mile daily commute (60 miles each way). will be selling way before it gets to 100,000 miles.Originally posted by eek View PostA 1.6l diesel golf was not on your list.
Hope you've bought a good one and have a decent length commute as the DPF stories are far too common.....Comment
-
It wasn't but the valuation they gave for my old golf wasOriginally posted by eek View PostA 1.6l diesel golf was not on your list.
Hope you've bought a good one and have a decent length commute as the DPF stories are far too common.....
. They wanted to get rid of some stock quickly perhaps due to new plate, end of tax year, God knows? I got it from a dealer with 12 months warranty and 2.5k before the valuation the car got online!
Also I read some awesome reviews about the DSG auto gearbox and I have not been let down!Comment
-
I don't need to give it a try, I am not the one that needed to open my eyes. I have also had 1.6 a 1.8 and currently a 2.2 diesel and know which of those three was the worst. Don't get me wrong, great car and the engines are much more pokey than they used to be but it's still the smallest and most underpowered. More than capable of what they are designed to do so it's picking at straws really. I think everyone who has contributed knew you would be happy with whatever you got if you stuck to the main stream cars, it's only you that is surprisedOriginally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View PostWhat you say is true except it really does have a lot more power than you expect, even getting from 80 - 90 mph aint that difficult. I think the 2.0 would be a lot more fun but as it stands I am very happy with my purchase in terms of a commuter car doing 120 miles a day. Will keep for 2 years and then trade in for one with adaptive cruise (comes as standard in the same model for the mk7).
I recommend you give it a try as I was a bit worried about this when I bought it but pleasantly surprised.
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Speak for yourself. I was just trolling.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI don't need to give it a try, I am not the one that needed to open my eyes. I have also had 1.6 a 1.8 and currently a 2.2 diesel and know which of those three was the worst. Don't get me wrong, great car and the engines are much more pokey than they used to be but it's still the smallest and most underpowered. More than capable of what they are designed to do so it's picking at straws really. I think everyone who has contributed knew you would be happy with whatever you got if you stuck to the main stream cars, it's only you that is surprised
Comment
-
Ultimately I realised that it was the cost per mile and relative value that mattered, even when earning > £400/day you don't want to be paying close to £1/mile for running a BMW. doing 120 miles a day in an already depreciated Golf made the most financial sense, I am just surprised by how good a car it is compared to my old one. Now when we come to buy a 4x4 it can be used by Mrs and won't cost much to run, especially if like suggested it is a Qashqai or the like.......Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI don't need to give it a try, I am not the one that needed to open my eyes. I have also had 1.6 a 1.8 and currently a 2.2 diesel and know which of those three was the worst. Don't get me wrong, great car and the engines are much more pokey than they used to be but it's still the smallest and most underpowered. More than capable of what they are designed to do so it's picking at straws really. I think everyone who has contributed knew you would be happy with whatever you got if you stuck to the main stream cars, it's only you that is surprised
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Today 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Yesterday 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19

Comment