Who's been banned and why? Your right to reply.

[minestrone]

Any chance we can get a more detailed explanation for Malcolm Buggeridge;s exclusion.

[AtW]

Any chance we can get a more detailed explanation for Malcolm Buggeridge;s exclusion.

You want to learn from his mistakes, eh?

[minestrone]

You want to learn from his mistakes, eh?

I want him to learn from his mistakes.

[AtW]

I want him to learn from his mistakes.

You can't teach DoggyStyles new tricks...

[minestrone]

"Breaching the warning that if sockie becomes a problem, they're out."

A few things jump out here, I don't know where in the forum he was a problem so I have no insight to the correctness of the decision. It is hard to have faith in a blind process,

People with multiple accounts face different rules on their accounts. So again moderation rules made up on the fly

The ad hoc manner in which a rule was created for him in a warning,

[AtW]

He was a very dull sockie from a long line of dull sockies from TykeMerc - it was not even funny, hope next one will get banned on sight.

[northernladuk]

He was a very dull sockie from a long line of dull sockies from TykeMerc - it was not even funny, hope next one will get banned on sight.

I don't know why they aren't. They all end exactly the same way.

[minestrone]

He was a very dull sockie from a long line of dull sockies from TykeMerc - it was not even funny, hope next one will get banned on sight.

Dull sockies should be taken to a small room with a small stapler and be given the opportunity to repent.

Great sockies should be given a protected status, I wold award Buggerlugs a CUK medal

[AtW]

Dull sockies should be taken to a small room with a small stapler and be given the opportunity to repent.

He can still repent...

[AtW]

Great sockies should be given a protected status, I wold award Buggerlugs a CUK medal

sasguru was a great sockie, maybe MarillionFan, but that's about it - even DimPrawn does not make the cut.