Who's been banned and why? Your right to reply.

[BrilloPad]

Sometimes competition is on price and he you have a lower cost base you can lower price. How do you not understand this?

Personally, I always take the best rate I can squeeze out for the gig. Most gigs the rate is almost unimportant. They want the right person.

[northernladyuk]

Some of them were motivated by cupidity, but mostly they were misled by the suppliers. Shame those ****ers can't be prosecuted and sent down. It's ridiculous - HMRC say if you're unsure, you must consult an expert. So you consult an expert, follow their advice and you are still are liable and they get away scot free, with their fees.

First, we kill all the QCs...

Funny how they get all shy about how their scheme worked. They all know they are bent.

[BrilloPad]

Funny how they get all shy about how their scheme worked. They all know they are bent.

I took HMRC advice. And relied on advisors. All the contractors I knew were doing it. It was like HMRC had approved it!

Of course, it took retrospection to defeat it. So it did work.

The only crime the people in the "safe space" made was being poor.

Can we not attack the common enemy here?

[northernladyuk]

I took HMRC advice. And relied on advisors. All the contractors I knew were doing it. It was like HMRC had approved it!

Of course, it took retrospection to defeat it. So it did work.

The only crime the people in the "safe space" made was being poor.

Can we not attack the common enemy here?

Honest contractors and bent contractors do not have a common enemy. You clearly belong to the latter group as demonstrated by your reluctance to describe your 'honest' scheme.

[BR14]

Honest contractors and bent contractors do not have a common enemy. You clearly belong to the latter group as demonstrated by your reluctance to describe your 'honest' scheme.

oerr missus

[BrilloPad]

Sometimes competition is on price and he you have a lower cost base you can lower price. How do you not understand this?

I suppose that in your line of work that is correct. Standard body shop twunts. Disguised employees.

The sort of gigs I do the right person is needed.

Of course, it is you standard body shop types who are bent and give us specialist honest types a bad name.

I don't really like throwing anyone under the bus. In your case, I will make an exception. And Churchill will be driving the bus......

[northernladyuk]

I suppose that in your line of work that is correct. Standard body shop twunts. Disguised employees.

The sort of gigs I do the right person is needed.

Of course, it is you standard body shop types who are bent and give us specialist honest types a bad name.

I don't really like throwing anyone under the bus. In your case, I will make an exception. And Churchill will be driving the bus......

Nothing to add to the discussion then? Shout all you like, but you are crooked and we all know it.

[BrilloPad]

Nothing to add to the discussion then? Shout all you like, but you are crooked and we all know it.

What discussion? You do nothing to contribute to discussion on CUK. Or anything on CUK come to that.

In your opinion I am crooked. However vast numbers of CUK posters see the HMRC situation very differently.

Nw I must go and throw you a bone in the B*****t forum.....

[northernladyuk]

What discussion? You do nothing to contribute to discussion on CUK. Or anything on CUK come to that.

In your opinion I am crooked. However vast numbers of CUK posters see the HMRC situation very differently.

Nw I must go and throw you a bone in the B*****t forum.....

The HMRC situation does not define whether or not your actions in the first place were bent. However if I have misjudged you, please do hold your head up high and explain how the scheme worked.

[BrilloPad]

The HMRC situation does not define whether or not your actions in the first place were bent. However if I have misjudged you, please do hold your head up high and explain how the scheme worked.

I did reply to that earlier.