Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I would certainly agree that these threads are a dialogue of the deaf, but if you're gonna cut 'n' paste, better accurate science from scientists than fact-free antiscience blogs and 'conservative' faux news outlets, no?
Science interests me, politics not so much. For this, I make no apologies.
My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.
Sas, what ARE your positions on the scientific and political aspects of climate change? Sorry if you already wrote it in the thread, I can't bear reading the whole thing to look.
I would certainly agree that these threads are a dialogue of the deaf, but if you're gonna cut 'n' paste, better accurate science from scientists than fact-free antiscience blogs and 'conservative' faux news outlets, no?
Science interests me, politics not so much. For this, I make no apologies.
Science does not interest you. I have put scientific solutions to you and you just retreat into dogma to fend off anything that will undermine the totem of your cause.
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone
Are people still denying climate change? So whats your position on the earths shape, have you at least accepted it's not flat?
Climates always change, that is about as startling a revelation as discovering that the weather changes during the year
To build intergovernmental excuses for new tax frauds around though, that is the issue
Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.
Science does not interest you. I have put scientific solutions to you and you just retreat into dogma to fend off anything that will undermine the totem of your cause.
Au contraire, I have pointed you to reasoned explanations, with evidence, of why the proposed solutions are unproven and unlikely to be effective. It is you who fails to support your argument.
My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.
Comment