Originally posted by DodgyAgent
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Dominoes - Pay a little more
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Much of that is right, but I wonder whether employers are prepared to consider an alternative to selecting those who have done unpaid internships; how about those who, like me and Lady Tester, went out to work in a low end job because they had to do that to earn a living and simply couldn't afford to do an internship (due to troubles in the family business at the time I had to leave college early, go to work, finish studying on the OU and her parents couldn't afford to support her through an internship either). She went into nursing because while she had the brains to be a doctor, nursing provided paid training, not out of any great desire to be a nurse; the passion she has for her work came later, long after she'd trained. Now I am not seeking sympathy at all because we have nothing to complain about, and this is not simply 'middle class concerns', it's actually a realisation that right now, the internship system has an effect of maintaining a status quo where the professions are a middle class bastion that is becoming more an more difficult for anyone without relatively wealty parents to break into. I think that can have lots of nasty consequences . I'm damned glad that back then low end jobs actually paid enough for both of us to get higher qualifications at the same time. We worked bloody hard to move on and up, and I think it would be a hell of a shame if people can't take that route to the professions. I am not objecting to people going on internships, but I'm concerned that it's acting as a barrier to those who simply cannot afford to go on internships. How should that be dealt with?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
So Tesco hire 1000 people on internship for free and sack or not employ 1000 workers. The profits are offshored. What benefit is that to UK PLC?Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostSo who's problem is it? If an intern requires money to support himself then he can go and pick fruit or clean floors. If Tesco are giving internships on the basis they are getting free labour then that is the deal take it or leave it. If Tesco are forced to pay then they may decide they don't want to employ the people and put a stop to it. Who wins then? The lefties because it pleases them that they have put a stop to exploitation whereas the would be interns have no avenue to get into retail and are left either on the dole or picking fruit.
There are a lot of things that need fixing to avoid the race to the bottom most large firms are running.
1. Remove subsidies for labour for established businesses - Companies will find a way to compete. Short term grants should be allowed to establish and build business. WFTC is an abomination.
2. Reduce or recognise that cheap imported labour will pull wages down. Decide how you give priority to citizens. Where it means little or no wage related tax is paid in the UK make that difficult to achieve.
3. Encourage long term unemployed back to work.Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostMuch of that is right, but I wonder whether employers are prepared to consider an alternative to selecting those who have done unpaid internships; how about those who, like me and Lady Tester, went out to work in a low end job because they had to do that to earn a living and simply couldn't afford to do an internship (due to troubles in the family business at the time I had to leave college early, go to work, finish studying on the OU and her parents couldn't afford to support her through an internship either). She went into nursing because while she had the brains to be a doctor, nursing provided paid training, not out of any great desire to be a nurse; the passion she has for her work came later, long after she'd trained. Now I am not seeking sympathy at all because we have nothing to complain about, and this is not simply 'middle class concerns', it's actually a realisation that right now, the internship system has an effect of maintaining a status quo where the professions are a middle class bastion that is becoming more an more difficult for anyone without relatively wealty parents to break into. I think that can have lots of nasty consequences . I'm damned glad that back then low end jobs actually paid enough for both of us to get higher qualifications at the same time. We worked bloody hard to move on and up, and I think it would be a hell of a shame if people can't take that route to the professions. I am not objecting to people going on internships, but I'm concerned that it's acting as a barrier to those who simply cannot afford to go on internships. How should that be dealt with?
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
A different argument and I agree with what you sayOriginally posted by vetran View PostSo Tesco hire 1000 people on internship for free and sack or not employ 1000 workers. The profits are offshored. What benefit is that to UK PLC?
There are a lot of things that need fixing to avoid the race to the bottom most large firms are running.
1. Remove subsidies for labour for established businesses - Companies will find a way to compete. Short term grants should be allowed to establish and build business. WFTC is an abomination.
2. Reduce or recognise that cheap imported labour will pull wages down. Decide how you give priority to citizens. Where it means little or no wage related tax is paid in the UK make that difficult to achieve.
3. Encourage long term unemployed back to work.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Yawn.Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View PostTell me what you mean by 'having to', and I'll tell you if it's 'violent force'.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Well there's universal healthcare and education, public housing built after the second world war to house those whose homes had been bombed and at the same time improve people's living standards, rationing that ensured everybody got sufficient nutrition, school dinners, public works that provided clean water even to slums in the 19th century, adding up to the fact that someone born to a poor family now can reasonably expect to live about twice as long as someone born to a poor family 200 years ago but otherwise, nothing governments have ever done to help the poor has ever worked, no.Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View PostEconomics, on the other hand, is fairly straight forward for anyone who cares to study the basics and it can be proven, objectively, that almost every single government policy to help the poor, or the economy, etc has the opposite effect.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
You have to pay money you owe or you will be taken to court and your assets seized to pay the debt.Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View PostTell me what you mean by 'having to', and I'll tell you if it's 'violent force'.
For example, if I 'have to' give my wallet to a mugger or he'll kidnap me and lock me in a cage, then I don't see how anyone couldn't regard that as violent force.Comment
-
...after you've had the opportunity to plead your case and explain why you believe you don't need to pay, and had professional legal advice provided to do so, and may even have won the case and had your debts removed from your name.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostYou have to pay money you owe or you will be taken to court and your assets seized to pay the debt...
It's all very violent indeed isn't it?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Thanks - I don't think I said anything about interns. I agree with you (and the government minister) that he should just offer better pay.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostMy view is that he should pay what the market says he should pay and not be allowed to go outside the EU. As for your comments about interns,......Comment
-
But what have the Romans ever done for us ?Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostWell there's universal healthcare and education, public housing built after the second world war to house those whose homes had been bombed and at the same time improve people's living standards, rationing that ensured everybody got sufficient nutrition, school dinners, public works that provided clean water even to slums in the 19th century, adding up to the fact that someone born to a poor family now can reasonably expect to live about twice as long as someone born to a poor family 200 years ago but otherwise, nothing governments have ever done to help the poor has ever worked, no.
Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment