Originally posted by JPennW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The UK is corrupt
Collapse
X
-
I thought that was quite stylish actually. Typical public school prank if you like. Much more enterprising than claiming for a new TV or a few extra pizzas.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
I actually don't see what the problem was. He was explicit in what he was claiming for, the person who approved the claim was negligent in actually letting it through......Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI thought that was quite stylish actually. Typical public school prank if you like. Much more enterprising than claiming for a new TV or a few extra pizzas.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI thought that was quite stylish actually. Typical public school prank if you like. Much more enterprising than claiming for a new TV or a few extra pizzas.And lets face it, what use is a moat that's full of shopping trolleys? It just won't do.Originally posted by eek View PostI actually don't see what the problem was. He was explicit in what he was claiming for, the person who approved the claim was negligent in actually letting it through......While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
ftfyOriginally posted by doodab View PostAnd lets face it, what use is a moat that's full of shopping trolleys? It just won't do, what what.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
That's because the pen-pushers who are supposed to be monitoring the conduct of 'important' people usually are reluctant to do so even if that's what they're paid to do. Why? Because they are themselves unethical and only care about pleasing 'important' people to improve future prospects.Originally posted by eek View PostI actually don't see what the problem was. He was explicit in what he was claiming for, the person who approved the claim was negligent in actually letting it through......Comment
-
What's the rate?Originally posted by masonryan View PostThat's because the pen-pushers who are supposed to be monitoring the conduct of 'important' people usually are reluctant to do so even if that's what they're paid to do. Why? Because they are themselves unethical and only care about pleasing 'important' people to improve future prospects.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I am sorry but you are wrong. Culturally we are less corrupt and we have laws and a free press that make corruption considerably more difficult than elsewhere.Originally posted by JPennW View PostI tend to ageee with Op, we're just as corrupt as everyone else as it's human nature. We're just better at pretending not to be. Remember the MP who claimed 20k for moat clearance? He thought that was perfectly acceptable as the system he was involved in, the UK government, made it perfectly acceptable. It was only the media and the public outcry that had any effect. Now they're just better at hiding their crimes.
If the government are so blasé about it, why should anyone else be different? At least in Africa they're openly corrupt!Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
example pleaseOriginally posted by masonryan View PostThat's because the pen-pushers who are supposed to be monitoring the conduct of 'important' people usually are reluctant to do so even if that's what they're paid to do. Why? Because they are themselves unethical and only care about pleasing 'important' people to improve future prospects.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
So why did we find out about the MP's expenses?Originally posted by masonryan View PostThat's because the pen-pushers who are supposed to be monitoring the conduct of 'important' people usually are reluctant to do so even if that's what they're paid to do. Why? Because they are themselves unethical and only care about pleasing 'important' people to improve future prospects.
Is it to do with a free press, people who went off to speak to journalists and tell them what they'd seen going on, and then an investigation that resulted in prosecutions?
Yes, there's corruption in the UK, but in a really deeply corrupt country, you'd never have found out about this.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
We're just as rational, self interested and prone to bouts of stupidity. That's not the same thing as corrupt though.Originally posted by JPennW View PostI tend to ageee with Op, we're just as corrupt as everyone else as it's human nature. We're just better at pretending not to be. Remember the MP who claimed 20k for moat clearance? He thought that was perfectly acceptable as the system he was involved in, the UK government, made it perfectly acceptable. It was only the media and the public outcry that had any effect. Now they're just better at hiding their crimes.
If the government are so blasé about it, why should anyone else be different? At least in Africa they're openly corrupt!While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Today 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Yesterday 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50

Comment