Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
So another Tory Government
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
As for supranational bodies that make laws, I think you'll have to accept that they will always need to exist
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone -
I agree with much of that, and I think this thread proves that the EU question is not a simple, binary 'in or out'; there are several different ways to approach it, and many of them are probably better than the extreme options of leaving altogether or diving into more integration.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostWe want competition. We want competition in taxes as much as we want competition in supply and demand. We want countries to maintain the integrity of their laws and customs, languages and to be different from each other. What we do not want is the sort of homologation of the sort that the EU is trying to drive us towards.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
As can be seen by the British government, do you really think that those people you voted for actually make policy? Policy is made by Whitehall mandarins who pass it onto the democratically elected representatives of the people who then passes it on as their idea and then votes for it. As for monopolies, don't you think that privatisation and PFI and outsourcing to what seems like just a few companies who then conspire to fix prices (see rail and energy) is not a form of monopoly? In fact what the British government is doing is playing monopoly with the resources of the UK, selling the UK to the highest bidder and then subsidising them because in fact they lied in their bids...If you really think that your elected representatives are acting in your best interests, your countries best interests and not for corporations then you're living in a dream world.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostWhat people do not realise is that the bigger corporations and countries grow the bigger the monopolies and the further they become from the control and accountability of the people they serve. If you think that giving away power to faceless unaccountable bureaucrats is the way forward then you have forgotten or ignored what history has taught us.“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
So would you also vote to leave NATO and the UN?Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostAs for supranational bodies that make laws, I think you'll have to accept that they will always need to exist
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Firstly, taxation doesn't work as a market, because people can't choose where they are taxed, it comes as part of a package.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostNO!
I want to see competition in Europe, not this harmonisation that will always lead to taxes going in only one direction; UP. Countries should be trying to attract talent and business by being more, not less competitive; that's the whole idea of a 'market'.
Secondly, lower taxes don't necessarily make a country more competitive, for example if they result in less good infrastructure and services.
Thirdly, harmonization needn't mean harmonizing rates (in Germany or the US for example, different states have different tax rates for some taxes), putting taxes up or introducing federal taxes. What it should mean is that an EU citizen only has to register for taxes once, declare income once, pay social insurance in their primary country of residence and so on without the current soup of complex and seemingly contradictory regulations.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
I totally agree with most of what you are saying. What you seem to miss is that I do not necessarily approve of what our governments do with the power they have. Just because our governments make bad policies and bad decisions does not mean we surrender the decision making process to someone else.Originally posted by darmstadt View PostAs can be seen by the British government, do you really think that those people you voted for actually make policy? Policy is made by Whitehall mandarins who pass it onto the democratically elected representatives of the people who then passes it on as their idea and then votes for it. As for monopolies, don't you think that privatisation and PFI and outsourcing to what seems like just a few companies who then conspire to fix prices (see rail and energy) is not a form of monopoly? In fact what the British government is doing is playing monopoly with the resources of the UK, selling the UK to the highest bidder and then subsidising them because in fact they lied in their bids...If you really think that your elected representatives are acting in your best interests, your countries best interests and not for corporations then you're living in a dream world.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Is DA complaining about outcomes created by free markets?Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostThere is an obsession with size and uniformity. Everything has to grow. Already we have this:
10 Corporations Control Almost Everything You Buy
What people do not realise is that the bigger corporations and countries grow the bigger the monopolies and the further they become from the control and accountability of the people they serve. If you think that giving away power to faceless unaccountable bureaucrats is the way forward then you have forgotten or ignored what history has taught us.
I think I need to go and lie down.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
If you have competitive tax systems this puts the onus of responsibility onto the people who raise tax and most importantly what they do with it. If tax is raised and is spent well on infrastructure, health and everything else then it will make that country a more desirable place to live, have well educated workers, and be a place in which to invest and build a business etc. If tax is harmonised then governments can do what they like with it (and given the chance they will ) because every country will be a bureaucratic high tax, low level public service autocracy.Originally posted by doodab View PostFirstly, taxation doesn't work as a market, because people can't choose where they are taxed, it comes as part of a package.
Secondly, lower taxes don't necessarily make a country more competitive, for example if they result in less good infrastructure and services.
Thirdly, harmonization needn't mean harmonizing rates (in Germany or the US for example, different states have different tax rates for some taxes), putting taxes up or introducing federal taxes. What it should mean is that an EU citizen only has to register for taxes once, declare income once, pay social insurance in their primary country of residence and so on without the current soup of complex and seemingly contradictory regulations.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Free markets create their own monopolies that destroy "free markets" ... have a long lie downOriginally posted by doodab View PostIs DA complaining about outcomes created by free markets?
I think I need to go and lie down.
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
NoOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostSo would you also vote to leave NATO and the UN?Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05

Comment