Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
"I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...
It's worked out as a scale of death and serious injury against volume of traffic carried. The motorways may have more accidents on them, but for the volume of traffic they carry the ratio of accidents per vehicle journey is a lot lower.
"Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.
It is indeed volume which makes motorways look all fairly safe. The Fosse way, in parts, and some of the Cotswolds have the worst records as they are twisty and carry far slower machinery, like tractors and such like. It encourages a bit of bravado in getting past them. I recall one road north out of Oxford featuring high on deaths/volume because of that.
I once read a P J Rourke book* in which, iirc, he said he gauged the difficulties of bends in 3rd world countries by seeing how many crosses were up as you approached the apex, the only time to worry he said, was when it was a double apex and more crosses appeared. It's bouquets of flowers in the UK.
The Fosse way, in parts, and some of the Cotswolds have the worst records as they are twisty and carry far slower machinery, like tractors and such like.
Comment