Who Said Law was boring?

[Halo Jones]

This is a transcript of a court Judgement; I can only imagine what the Judge had to read in advance of this case…

[NickFitz]

Great intro: "Some people might have found that exciting enough..."

[vetran]

given the nature of their relationship whereby she was no more than one of the many bunnies in his club (or as Mr Baxendale-Waker himself might succinctly put it, one of the "tulip girls")

Charming!

[northernladuk]

The provision is always conditional on my satisfaction with the relationship. As soon as I am no longer satisfied, the use benefits are withdrawn."

Sounds like my missus.

[northernladuk]

So.... being a bit of a simple straight talking northern bloke.... Who got the flat and range rover?

[eek]

So.... being a bit of a simple straight talking northern bloke.... Who got the flat and range rover?

Summary judgement was rejected. So nothing has been decided but the Judge doesn't like the bloke....

[Halo Jones]

So.... being a bit of a simple straight talking northern bloke.... Who got the flat and range rover?

His name was 1st on the document which means he was asking for summary judgement on who owned the 2 items, the Judge dismisses the application in item 50 which means he loses & she gets them

[Old Greg]

I'm not sure about the corner bath.

[NickFitz]

His name was 1st on the document which means he was asking for summary judgement on who owned the 2 items, the Judge dismisses the application in item 50 which means he loses & she gets them

No, it means the case goes on to be heard in full, unless he does the sensible thing and cuts his losses. Given that the judge strongly implies that he's submitted dodgy, post-dated documents in support of his claim, he might well not want to have his claim examined in full any more

[Halo Jones]

No, it means the case goes on to be heard in full, unless he does the sensible thing and cuts his losses. Given that the judge strongly implies that he's submitted dodgy, post-dated documents in support of his claim, he might well not want to have his claim examined in full any more

TBH I have not dealt with summary judgements, I was researching concurrent delays & wandered into this one.

“Summary Judgement” Noted for future research