- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Cameron the cock-block
Collapse
X
-
Cameron the cock-block
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishing -
As you're going to have to opt-in to still see porn, then it is effectively a club. If they're clever, the ISPs will sell the opt-in list to porn marketers (not to mention special branch).Will work inside IR35. Or for food. -
The twat was talking about making “companies like Google prevent such search results. They are clever so they can find a solution…” Does twat Cameron think that all search engines are under his power? I don’t think Yandex will listen to him."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
I do think its reasonable for google etc to default to searches that don't have adult content. Try searching for 'cute pussies and then think that could be an innocent 10 year old. Its not hard (well not until you have visited dome of the results) but it will need something to force Google etc to turn down the advertising revenue / actively exclude the search results. A law saying they should will allow them to blacklist the sites with reasonable legal immunity.Originally posted by Paddy View PostThe twat was talking about making “companies like Google prevent such search results. They are clever so they can find a solution…” Does twat Cameron think that all search engines are under his power? I don’t think Yandex will listen to him.
If you want a hand shandy there are plenty of way to find sites.
I do however worry they will over legislate and make porn on the web effectively illegal in the UK driving suppliers out of business, and extending it to niche fetishes etc.Comment
-
His heart is in the right place. His head seems to be firmly wedged up his arse though.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
When they operate in the UK they are under "his" power. He does have the power to block sites from access via the UK, or could gain this power anyway. For instance if Yandex returned results for "child porn" all ISPs would be forced to block it.Originally posted by Paddy View PostThe twat was talking about making “companies like Google prevent such search results. They are clever so they can find a solution…” Does twat Cameron think that all search engines are under his power? I don’t think Yandex will listen to him.
Question: how is "porn" determined in this context? Is it going to be like workplace filters which block some entirely legit sites, or will it be specifically for porn sites rather than sites which might contain some dodgy stuff?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Cameron's anti-porn plans: problematic in practice, but right in principle. Conservatives aren't libertarians. The Tory Diary
the conservative party are discussing this at this link, rather interesting to see their comments
Comment
-
WDDS, the principle is good but the massive problems they will have with implementation, the ramifications on privacy and the wider issue of where this will stop are massive.Originally posted by doodab View PostHis heart is in the right place. His head seems to be firmly wedged up his arse though.Comment
-
Comment
-
The ramifications for legitimate sites which inadvertently get blocked is worrying.Originally posted by administrator View PostWDDS, the principle is good but the massive problems they will have with implementation, the ramifications on privacy and the wider issue of where this will stop are massive.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Today 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10

Comment