- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Cameron the cock-block
Collapse
X
-
Cameron the cock-block
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishing -
As you're going to have to opt-in to still see porn, then it is effectively a club. If they're clever, the ISPs will sell the opt-in list to porn marketers (not to mention special branch).Will work inside IR35. Or for food. -
The twat was talking about making “companies like Google prevent such search results. They are clever so they can find a solution…” Does twat Cameron think that all search engines are under his power? I don’t think Yandex will listen to him."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
I do think its reasonable for google etc to default to searches that don't have adult content. Try searching for 'cute pussies and then think that could be an innocent 10 year old. Its not hard (well not until you have visited dome of the results) but it will need something to force Google etc to turn down the advertising revenue / actively exclude the search results. A law saying they should will allow them to blacklist the sites with reasonable legal immunity.Originally posted by Paddy View PostThe twat was talking about making “companies like Google prevent such search results. They are clever so they can find a solution…” Does twat Cameron think that all search engines are under his power? I don’t think Yandex will listen to him.
If you want a hand shandy there are plenty of way to find sites.
I do however worry they will over legislate and make porn on the web effectively illegal in the UK driving suppliers out of business, and extending it to niche fetishes etc.Comment
-
His heart is in the right place. His head seems to be firmly wedged up his arse though.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
When they operate in the UK they are under "his" power. He does have the power to block sites from access via the UK, or could gain this power anyway. For instance if Yandex returned results for "child porn" all ISPs would be forced to block it.Originally posted by Paddy View PostThe twat was talking about making “companies like Google prevent such search results. They are clever so they can find a solution…” Does twat Cameron think that all search engines are under his power? I don’t think Yandex will listen to him.
Question: how is "porn" determined in this context? Is it going to be like workplace filters which block some entirely legit sites, or will it be specifically for porn sites rather than sites which might contain some dodgy stuff?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Cameron's anti-porn plans: problematic in practice, but right in principle. Conservatives aren't libertarians. The Tory Diary
the conservative party are discussing this at this link, rather interesting to see their comments
Comment
-
WDDS, the principle is good but the massive problems they will have with implementation, the ramifications on privacy and the wider issue of where this will stop are massive.Originally posted by doodab View PostHis heart is in the right place. His head seems to be firmly wedged up his arse though.Comment
-
Comment
-
The ramifications for legitimate sites which inadvertently get blocked is worrying.Originally posted by administrator View PostWDDS, the principle is good but the massive problems they will have with implementation, the ramifications on privacy and the wider issue of where this will stop are massive.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Autumn Budget 2026: 10 predictions for UK contractors Yesterday 00:08
- Is HMRC ‘cruelly seeking to transfer debts’ to MSC contractors? Sep 28 06:37
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Sep 25 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12

Comment