• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Cameron the cock-block"

Collapse

  • petergriffin
    replied
    Police quiz 62-year-old who advised Cameron on web filters and was tipped for peerage

    Police quiz 62-year-old who advised Cameron on web filters



    No 10 aide arrested over child porn: Police quiz man who advised Cameron on web filters | Mail Online

    In a crusade spearheaded by the Prime Minister, Downing Street brokered a deal with internet firms which means that all 20million households connected to the internet are being contacted and asked whether they want family-friendly filters installed.
    Downing Street also persuaded Google and other search engines to introduce changes that will prevent depraved images from being listed in results for more than 100,000 searches.

    Downing Street confirmed that Mr Rock, who lives in West London, had been involved in the policy.
    'The Prime Minister believes that child abuse imagery is abhorrent and that anyone involved with it should be properly dealt with under the law.'
    Downing Street spokesman

    'Patrick Rock was one of a number of advisers and officials involved in dealing with this issue – but the work was led by somebody else, and decisions were taken by ministers,' a spokesman said.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    A terrifying view of how this could work in reality

    http://youtu.be/hvBB225CZfE

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    A terrifying view of how this could work in reality

    http://youtu.be/hvBB225CZfE

    Leave a comment:


  • Lockhouse
    replied
    Have we done this yet?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Should start by getting his own house in order: Parliament Computers used to access porn sites, including foot and fat fetishism, more than 2,500 times

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Luckily I w*nk into an old sock.
    I had to replace mine so now use loo rolls nicked from work as its cheaper:

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Wanking tax? How will they enforce that?
    If they find a way, they'll be making money hand over fist.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    VAT on tissues will be set at 30%
    Luckily I w*nk into an old sock.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Wanking tax? How will they enforce that?
    VAT on tissues will be set at 30%

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Is it going to be anything like the 'V-chip' in septic televisions? If so, one of the arguments used to legislate that was over public concern with young people committing acts of violence such as school massacres. Looks like thats a great success, in fact something like only 15% of people actually activate it. However, if he does go ahead then hopefully the Daily Mail will be blocked, a website that on its front page bellows for laws to stop pornography yet on its sidebar shows pictures of under 16's in skimpy clothing with text to match. You do realise that the next step is they will use this as an argument to continue to intercept all internet communications legally in order to crack down on porn (if its only child porn, then yes, this is reasonably acceptable but it won't stop there.)

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Wanking tax? How will they enforce that?
    Eye tests. The further from 20/20 you are the more tax you pay.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Why don't they just legalize it and tax it?
    Wanking tax? How will they enforce that?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Why don't they just legalize it and tax it?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Google already has pretty much an 'opt-in' with: Safe Search for Kids. The Google safe search engine for kids with friendly search. and I would presume most other search engines do to. This is all absolute bollocks and should be 'opt-out' if anything and is going to cause more problems than it cures. ******* numpty nanny state, try educating the parents instead knobend wet behind the ears Tory

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    They don't get a choice to opt in though.
    Nor will we if everything that Cameron wants happens.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X