The Ashes

[d000hg]

This game is bizarre.

I'm in favour of the technology - it's new to me since I haven't followed cricket for years - but really does EVERY wicket have to be reviewed?

[stek]

This game is bizarre.

I'm in favour of the technology - it's new to me since I haven't followed cricket for years - but really does EVERY wicket have to be reviewed?

Think u only get three...

[d000hg]

Think u only get three...

Don't you keep the review if you are right?

[Ketchup]

Don't you keep the review if you are right?

I thought it was 2

[stek]

Don't you keep the review if you are right?

I wouldn't know I've only seen Australia do it!

[Ketchup]

Is it too early to be hoping for a follow on?

[Old Hack]

2 reviews, per team, per innings. Reviews kept if successful.

You always want to see two sides bat before you make a decision on any match, as what may look a sub par total, can look an awful lot by the start of the second innings. I can, however, see Clarke scoring a ton here, as he's a quality player. I thought anything over 350 was par for this pitch, but I guess we'll know more about 6.30.

[stek]

60-odd for 4 now...

[DodgyAgent]

This game is bizarre.

I'm in favour of the technology - it's new to me since I haven't followed cricket for years - but really does EVERY wicket have to be reviewed?

Anything that removes the opportunities for Aussies to whinge and make excuses is a good idea

[quackhandle]

It's a proper batting wicket, but someone might want to mention it to the Aussie top order.

qh