Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Desperation much in evidence. Another day, another blog. Ok, it's Forbes, but they publish just about anything from their 'contributors'. This guy ...
Peter J. Ferrara (born 1955) is an American lawyer, policy analyst, and columnist who is the current general counsel for the American Civil Rights Union and analyst for The Heartland Institute.
seems to be even more devoid of scientific credentials than the usual cross-post we get here. Heartland being the charming people who associated believers in AGW with the Unabomber in a series of tasteless billboards.
Can't be Rsed debunking this rubbish, I doubt if anyone here cares much. If you do - just cross-refer his arguments with the Skeptical Science website. The piece is just a collection of long-discredited BS.
In other news, a recent paper in the journal Environmental Research Letters analysed a sample of circa 12,000 recent papers on climate change and Global Warming, rating them according to whether they endorsed or rejected the concensus position that human activity is causing most of GW. The study concluded that of those expressing a position ....
My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.
Desperation much in evidence. Another day, another blog. Ok, it's Forbes, but they publish just about anything from their 'contributors'. This guy ...
Peter J. Ferrara (born 1955) is an American lawyer, policy analyst, and columnist who is the current general counsel for the American Civil Rights Union and analyst for The Heartland Institute.
seems to be even more devoid of scientific credentials than the usual cross-post we get here. Heartland being the charming people who associated believers in AGW with the Unabomber in a series of tasteless billboards.
Can't be Rsed debunking this rubbish, I doubt if anyone here cares much. If you do - just cross-refer his arguments with the Skeptical Science website. The piece is just a collection of long-discredited BS.
In other news, a recent paper in the journal Environmental Research Letters analysed a sample of circa 12,000 recent papers on climate change and Global Warming, rating them according to whether they endorsed or rejected the concensus position that human activity is causing most of GW. The study concluded that of those expressing a position ....
Trouble is that the pro climate science lobby are such a bunch of condescending tosspots, it almost makes you hope that they are right so that when you buy a new car and choose a 6.3 litre v8 over a Toyota Pious, you will have the satisfaction of knowing that you have just annoyed them almost as much as they get on your tits in the first place
Comment