• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Woolwich Incident

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    Wrong places wrong times

    The police had been tracking him for a while and made a number of errors before going in for the kill
    And don't forget the police lied about the manner in which he was killed. Overall a mighty big cockup..which everyone (the police) got away with. Heck people were promoted after that.
    McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
    Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."

    Comment


      Originally posted by sasguru View Post
      It won't have any effect on UKIP's vote since one of the guys was born in Britain. His parents live in a little village outside Lincoln FFS. All the murderous local terrorists so far seem to be British born.
      Dangerous, those bumpkins. Especially Lincolnshirist radicals.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
        And don't forget the police lied about the manner in which he was killed. Overall a mighty big cockup..which everyone (the police) got away with. Heck people were promoted after that.
        And tampered with evidence, which would land anyone else in prison.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          So the status of his paperwork was actually completely irrelevant and it was rather spiteful and unnecessary for you to raise the subject.
          you raised the situation as an example of a successful long drawn out enquiry. I pointed out it didn't identify his immigration status effectively, the full facts surrounding the shooting (I'm pretty sure there are more) or result in anyone being penalised for a disgraceful screw up and cover up.

          You jumped on the immigration point and stated without evidence he wasn't an illegal when it was quite clearly a vague situation and the government are keen to keep it that way.

          Comment


            Originally posted by sasguru View Post
            However the religionists argue it the facts remain:

            1. they put their faith in some books written thousands ago.
            2. they have no evidence they can produce to show these books originate in any way other than from other men.

            It's all bollux.

            HTH, BIKIW.
            Modern philosophy and mathematics is based on 'some books written thousands of years ago' so you only have one point to make, not two.
            Originally posted by MaryPoppins
            I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
            Originally posted by vetran
            Urine is quite nourishing

            Comment


              Originally posted by sasguru View Post
              It won't have any effect on UKIP's vote since one of the guys was born in Britain. His parents live in a little village outside Lincoln FFS. All the murderous local terrorists so far seem to be British born.
              I guess as a British born black guy you're more likely than most to have some identity issues - you don't look like the citizens of the country you're supposed to belong to, and there's still plenty of racial abuse. Your parent's country is somewhere you've no real associations with - you don't feel you belong anywhere properly. As such, you're a prime candidate for extremist nutters who give you the "belonging" you're missing.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                Tell me this; why would people who call themselves 'Christians' really be too bothered about rules and exhortations in the Old Testament, given that the word 'Christian' implies that they follow the teachings of Jesus Christ, as documented in the New Testament?

                In other words, it seems to me that the Old Testament isn't really the key to Christianity, but perhaps is a store of the historical backgrounds.
                The main reason is that the vast majority of Christians pick and choose which bits of the bible they like and either ignore bits they don't or find ways to rationalise them away.

                They are often the same people who claim that the bible has no contradictions, no 'bad sciene', that eternal torture for a finite sin (which you may not have intentionally committed) and that they will be happy in heaven knowing that people in hell for reasons which they could not control are being horrifically tortured and will be forever. Some Christians have even told me they look forward to seeing me there.
                "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

                https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Old Hack View Post
                  Absolutely untrue, absolutely. The whole ethos of this religion, is that there is no word per se, there are teachings, which are subjective.

                  Let's look at "Fight and slay the infidels wherever you find them" - Historically, you can argue when Islam was powerful, this didn't happen and it's simply the way the Quran was writen. However, do you think an Imam could not put a different spin on the meaning of the words?

                  **** a duck, the whole smoke and mirrors about religion is that you base beliefs on the interpretations. Listen to two priest talk of the same parables, and they can very easily come up with two interpretations.

                  It's the same in islam

                  "And fight in the cause of Allah with those who fight with you, and do not exceed the limits, surely Allah does not love those who exceed the limits. And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from where they drove you out..."
                  Very interesting - so it says to not exceed the limits. These guys have exceeded all limits and boundaries!

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by vetran View Post
                    you raised the situation as an example of a successful long drawn out enquiry. I pointed out it didn't identify his immigration status effectively, the full facts surrounding the shooting (I'm pretty sure there are more) or result in anyone being penalised for a disgraceful screw up and cover up.

                    You jumped on the immigration point and stated without evidence he wasn't an illegal when it was quite clearly a vague situation and the government are keen to keep it that way.
                    That was me
                    evidence:
                    BBC NEWS | UK | Menezes picture 'was manipulated'

                    Earlier, Mr Thwaites cross-examined immigration official Paul Roach over a counterfeit stamp found in the Brazilian's passport, asking if this meant he had been in the country illegally.

                    Mr Roach told the court Mr de Menezes first entered the country on 13 March 2002 and was given six months' leave to remain, before extending his stay, as a student, to 30 June 2003.

                    The next record was of him arriving in Ireland from France on 23 April 2005 but there was no notification of when he returned to the UK.

                    The court heard how as a person entering Britain from Ireland, he would have had an automatic three-month leave to remain which at the earliest would have run out on 23 July, the day after he was killed.
                    Coffee's for closers

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
                      The main reason is that the vast majority of Christians pick and choose which bits of the bible they like and either ignore bits they don't or find ways to rationalise them away.

                      They are often the same people who claim that the bible has no contradictions, no 'bad sciene', that eternal torture for a finite sin (which you may not have intentionally committed) and that they will be happy in heaven knowing that people in hell for reasons which they could not control are being horrifically tortured and will be forever. Some Christians have even told me they look forward to seeing me there.
                      Mosquito!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X