Originally posted by Old Greg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
surprise
Collapse
X
-
-
But it is the question (or position) that is flawed so completely unanswerable. There has to be some context to differentiate the real use of the system against the abuse, something like adding 'if they have come over for no other reason than the free hand outs', or 'if they were not not entitled to them in their own country' .. or something that you can actually argue.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostI'm not worried about current arrangements. I'm contesting your position that overseas born residents should be entitled to no benefits.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Thankyou!Originally posted by northernladuk View PostBut it is the question (or position) that is flawed so completely unanswerable. There has to be some context to differentiate the real use of the system against the abuse, something like adding 'if they have come over for no other reason than the free hand outs', or 'if they were not not entitled to them in their own country' .. or something that you can actually argue.Comment
-
Yes, you are right. Abuse of the system has to be tackled, and that's difficult enough without complicating it with discussions and rules about where someone was born or which country has given them citizenship. If you want to tackle benefit fraud, tackle benefit fraud. If you want to tackle immigration, tackle immigration. Don't confuse the two issues.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostBut it is the question (or position) that is flawed so completely unanswerable. There has to be some context to differentiate the real use of the system against the abuse, something like adding 'if they have come over for no other reason than the free hand outs', or 'if they were not not entitled to them in their own country' .. or something that you can actually argue.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
My point exactly, OG brought in his 'UK born children' they however cute they may be they are irrelevant.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYou're missing the point entirely. OG is talking about an adult who has paid into the system all her working life, and in that case, yes, she would be eligible for benefits in Italy. As for children who've never paid in, that's an entirely different category and it would depend on whether they have Italian nationality. If they do, then yes, they have the same rights as any other Italian citizen.
and the answer is 'it depends on the rules' not 'its not fair'.
I'm all for an insurance backed JSA scheme and a much less generous safety net with workfare.Comment
-
So actually, your problem is with a social insurance system that is structured the wrong way and badly run, regardless of the rights of foreigners. Not the fault of foreigners, immigrants, the EU, muslims or anyone else on the standard list, but the fault of British governments and the British citizens that put them in power. Stop clouding the issue with nationality, because in the system as it should be run, it's irrelevant.Originally posted by vetran View PostMy point exactly, OG brought in his 'UK born children' they however cute they may be they are irrelevant.
and the answer is 'it depends on the rules' not 'its not fair'.
I'm all for an insurance backed JSA scheme and a much less generous safety net with workfare.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostSorry that's a bit Glib
FTFY
If 20% of our population were like
Johnny Chung Lee - Projects
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakshmi_Mittal
etc
and had no recourse to benefits and could be deported if they broke our laws, I think most people would see them as a benefit.Your position is clear from the above and subsequent discussion.Originally posted by vetran View Postand I said that where?Comment
-
The relevance ought to be obvious. Overseas born non-citizens have dependents who are born in the UK and British citizens. See?Originally posted by vetran View PostMy point exactly, OG brought in his 'UK born children' they however cute they may be they are irrelevant.
and the answer is 'it depends on the rules' not 'its not fair'.
I'm all for an insurance backed JSA scheme and a much less generous safety net with workfare.Comment
-
Because that's not the point of the system, you aren't accruing benefits by paying in.Originally posted by vetran View PostIf many UK citizens pay tax all their lives and never see of it back as benefits why should we pay out to someone who isn't a UK citizen who has paid tax?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
25% in Basel. The largest immigrant group is Italian, followed by German/Austrian and the former Yugoslavia.Originally posted by The Spartan View PostWhen I was in Switzerland someone told me 20% of their population was made up of foreigners, of which I was obviously one
My wife has a British passport and wasn't born in the UK. Neither were her brother and sister. All three have degrees (Biochemistry, Chemical Engineering, Business and Law - so at least two proper degrees). However, 33% have emigrated.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is your Director’s Loan Account (DLS) a target of HMRC’s closer look at close companies? Yesterday 04:45
- Contractors, are you making any of the five big limited company bank account mistakes of 2026? May 28 05:51
- ‘Welcome’ increase in HMRC mileage rates for contractors using their own cars for work May 27 05:18
- King’s Speech 2026 including a welcome Late Payments Bill still leaves contractors short May 26 04:42
- Getting a mortgage when you're a contractor. The system wasn't built for you. Is that finally changing? May 22 06:11
- How deepfake AI contractors threaten umbrella company supply chains under JSL May 20 06:31
- Mileage rates review: Will the first AMAP rethink in 15 years benefit contractors? May 19 05:57
- What is a Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE), and are FDE jobs for IT contractors ripe? May 18 04:43
- IT contractor demand lunged towards growth in April 2026 May 13 04:48
- What does PGMOL’s win over HMRC mean for contractors? May 12 07:25

Comment