• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Life's little annoyances...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Re: Life's little annoyances...

    Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post
    Agreed ^

    I suspect I've said all of the below here on CUK at some point before, but:

    - When people hold a door open when I'm still quite far away from the door, forcing me to break into that stupid trot - then thank them for it. There should be some sort of legal minimum for door holder opening.

    - People who have to point out they've just made a 'joke'. Usually the same sort of people who describe themselves as 'mental'.

    - People who pronounce 'specifically' as 'pacifically'.
    People who say:

    "Mute point"
    "Vicer versa"
    "Going forward"
    "Touch base"
    "Haitch"
    "One way hash"
    "Two way hash" ( yes there are edge cases where these phrases can be acceptable but not usually in the context of useful cryptography)
    "In the cloud"
    "Byod"
    "Secure <noun>" ( without any evidence/qualifiers)

    There's more...


    Sent from my tweeting foot massager.
    B00med!

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post

      People who pronounce 'specifically' as 'pacifically'.
      'Brought' instead of 'bought'.
      Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

      Comment


        #33
        People who turn up at your home half and hour early.

        Doesn't it occur to them that I might be having a dump or shower or a snack in that time?
        Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Sysman View Post
          People who turn up at your home half and hour early.

          Doesn't it occur to them that I might be having a dump or shower or a snack in that time?
          Pot noodle?

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by vetran View Post
            I do it because I am a gentleman not in the misplaced belief you are a lady, maam.

            should bunch their knickers.
            or clench their cheeks tighter to hold them up.

            I could never get used to pants hauled up and bunched in at the back, but most women seem to prefer wearing their knickers that way. I suppose the advantage is it doesn't show hemlines, except near the top.
            Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
              Struggling to imagine how a second day wearing the same knickers can affect how far they droop, unless perhaps you mean two days' continuous wear.

              A more detailed explanation, with pictures, would definitely help.
              Noooo. I am not saying I wear undercrackers 2 days on the trot. I meant that in whipping my clothes off the day before, I managed to miss that I had left my knickers bunched up in the trousers.
              Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
              +5 Xeno Cool Points

              Comment


                #37
                Things that wind me up!

                1. Cretins
                2. Morons
                3. Lists of things

                Comment


                  #38
                  People 'dropping in' on me for a cup of tea. No - fkc off. Phone before you come round.

                  Realising I dropped a bit of chocolate while driving, which has melted on the back of my trousers/skirt, making me look incontinent.

                  'I will see you there at 7am tomorrow morning'
                  Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
                  +5 Xeno Cool Points

                  Comment


                    #39
                    People who send you an e-mail asking you to e-mail someone else and copy them in when they could have just done it themselves
                    People who stick meetings in way after office hours or all through your lunch despite the fact you have it blocked off and then complain when you cannot make these meetings.
                    Last edited by norrahe; 22 April 2013, 12:34.
                    "Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what's for lunch." - Orson Welles

                    Norrahe's blog

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post
                      'I will see you there at 7am tomorrow morning'
                      'I doubt it' is the appropriate response to that I think
                      While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X