• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Flat-rate State Pension - Opinions?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Because its far cheaper to give everyone x rather than topping it up which costs a £1bn for admin on top and still doesn't reach many who should get the money),

    The state pension should give everyone enough to live on without form filling (as an aside Age Concern are brilliant at filling the forms in) as that would save money (its the reason why winter fuel and travel cards are universal benefits).

    At the end of the day this is supposed to be a universal pension for those who reached the age at which a significant majority of people are unable to work. Does it really matter what people did prior to reaching that age?
    A pension is for those who've worked for it and made their contributions, there's a welfare system already in place for those who don't. I'm all for providing people with the bare minimum to live with by default, but when people who choose to have career breaks (or no career at all) or choose to remain in unprofitable self-employment, I don't agree with directly subsidising their pensions by charging everyone else more and making all of us work for longer. And in some cases that's quite a large increase (for those on final salary pension schemes) - my neighbours, a nurse and a firefighter, are both affected. Why anyone would wish to screw over those professions in particular remains a mystery to me.
    In my household it's just my other half (university lecturer).

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by eek View Post
      Because its far cheaper to give everyone x rather than topping it up which costs a £1bn for admin on top and still doesn't reach many who should get the money),

      The state pension should give everyone enough to live on without form filling (as an aside Age Concern are brilliant at filling the forms in) as that would save money (its the reason why winter fuel and travel cards are universal benefits).

      At the end of the day this is supposed to be a universal pension for those who reached the age at which a significant majority of people are unable to work. Does it really matter what people did prior to reaching that age?
      WHS

      A universal base pension level is cheaper for taxpayers, far easier to administer, and a dependable safety net for people becoming unable to do much about their circumstances.

      Most older people haven't got much other money and will be on a fixed income for the rest of their lives. £144 a week won't exactly provide a luxurious existence.

      I'm just surprised this is coming from the Tories and not the Labour party.
      Last edited by Doggy Styles; 14 January 2013, 09:56.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
        A universal base pension level is cheaper for taxpayers
        So if this is so much cheaper, why take the money directly from nurses, firefighters, police, etc and increase everyone's pension age to fund it?

        TBH, I would have preferred an equal tax increase for all, rather than just grossly disadvantaging some of the already relatively poorly paid public sector workers.

        Also, if on benefits you're expected to live of £71/week, why are you suddenly deserving of more just cause you're old? Don't get me wrong, I don't think £71/week is really livable, but I don't see the justification in paying more based solely on age (as this is obviously only a benefit to those who wouldn't have normally worked enough to truly qualify for that same pension).

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by formant View Post
          TBH, I would have preferred an equal tax increase for all, rather than just grossly disadvantaging some of the already relatively poorly paid public sector workers.
          Poorly paid? hasn't this myth been dispelled already
          In Scooter we trust

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by formant View Post
            So if this is so much cheaper, why take the money directly from nurses, firefighters, police, etc and increase everyone's pension age to fund it?

            TBH, I would have preferred an equal tax increase for all, rather than just grossly disadvantaging some of the already relatively poorly paid public sector workers.
            One reason is that attacking those lucky enough to get a final salary pension scheme is a no lose proposition. Thanks to Mr Brown its only the public sector who has such schemes and if anyone complains about their tax treatment the general public is likely to say but you still have one and we don't.

            Considering the amount of money I would need to get an annuity paying the equivalent of my wife's pittance of a final salary pension I don't think anyone is going to stand alongside them as they protest.
            merely at clientco for the entertainment

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by formant View Post
              choose to remain in unprofitable self-employment
              I'm interested to know what you think the alternative is. Let's say that you've got a tradesman - an electrician for example - who is a trained electrician, fully certified etc but can't find sufficient work to live off because the work just isn't there.

              What do you expect that person to do in order to make their self-employment profitable?

              Comment


                #17
                ANother mess our children will be lumbered with.
                McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
                Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by RasputinDude View Post
                  I'm interested to know what you think the alternative is. Let's say that you've got a tradesman - an electrician for example - who is a trained electrician, fully certified etc but can't find sufficient work to live off because the work just isn't there.

                  What do you expect that person to do in order to make their self-employment profitable?
                  What we're all expected to do in that sort of case - broaden skills-range, relocate, re-train, etc.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by RasputinDude View Post
                    I'm interested to know what you think the alternative is. Let's say that you've got a tradesman - an electrician for example - who is a trained electrician, fully certified etc but can't find sufficient work to live off because the work just isn't there.

                    What do you expect that person to do in order to make their self-employment profitable?
                    Emigrate to Australia. Tonnes of work for skilled trades there.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by formant View Post
                      ...Not sure why people who choose not to work/ have gaps in their employment should be entitle to the same pension as someone who's paid more tax during his/her life.
                      FTFY.

                      NI contributions are just at tax. There is no pot. People drawing their pensions are being paid out of the tax gathered now.

                      You might as well complain that people who are high earners and therefore have paid more tax than middle earners will get the same state pension.
                      Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X