• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Jimmy Savile 'household name' sweep

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by ZARDOZ View Post
    Taken them long enough, another of his mates is still in parliament serving on committees. Has a very appropriate name
    P D O'Phile ????
    Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

    No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

    Comment


      ....

      Originally posted by AtW View Post
      If there was such "solid evidence" and no action was taken, then it would be leaked to mass media, it's not 80s now...
      You are forgetting the fact that MI5, Special Branch and the Cabinet Office are involved in the cover up. With their propensity for sealing documents for 50 years or more, it will be difficult to unearth much.

      Comment


        Will buried Dunblane files reveal a sinister cover-up?

        Frederick Forsyth in the Express


        THE debauching of a child for personal gratification is a filthy perversion and an equally filthy crime in statute law.

        Yet revelations – Savile, Smith, Hall, Harris – seem to inform us that this perversion is a lot more widespread than many had ever imagined.

        Hardly a week goes by without another iconic individual being exposed or cyber police tracing networks of online perverts who want to watch and presumably gloat.

        The idea that this is a victimless activity, “I was only looking at images”, is rubbish. These libraries of filth, pain, humiliation, even torture, have to be ordered and paid for.

        That enables others to set up the studios, groom the children and film the obscenities that then occur. If no one paid for bread there would be no farmers growing wheat.

        The fact that the high and mighty are in no way immune to this vice means that when they are threatened with exposure immensely powerful forces are brought to bear to accomplish a high-level cover-up.

        This seems to have happened in the case of the list of names handed to the Home Office years ago by the late Geoffrey Dickens, MP. It just vanished.

        But the strangest cover-up I have ever witnessed (or suspected because it was highly successful) concerned what liaisons and practices lay behind the Dunblane massacre of 1996.

        We were all told to believe that a single psychopath, Thomas Hamilton, with a private armoury, stalked into a kindergarten in a Scottish village, murdered 16 children and one teacher, then shot himself. So sad.

        Senior Scottish lawyer Lord Cullen was asked to prepare an investigation and report. He did both. It was one of the weirdest documents the Scottish establishment has ever produced; not because of what it said but what it refused to ask or investigate.

        Lord Cullen apparently held 100 hearings in public then six crucial ones in private. He decreed his report should be buried for 100 years.

        But that is longer than our nuclear secrets have to remain confidential. So what did those last six witnesses reveal?

        Others came forward, not summoned, never heard by officialdom, to allege Hamilton was a practising pervert and pederast.

        That he had free access to a nearby boys’ boarding school and could be seen prowling the dormitories after lights out.

        That he was the “trawler” for likely boys for a ring of extremely senior figures including police chiefs, lawyers, judges and Freemasons, plus very senior figures in Scottish Labour.

        Witnesses disappeared, changed their minds. Editors about to assign investigative reporters were advised that would be most unwise.

        The village bobby of Dunblane was transferred so far north he was practically waist deep in the North Sea.

        If cover-up it was, and I have not the slightest doubt, it remains one of the most successful ever.

        Officially it remains a case of a single psychopath, with guns he should never have had, who sort of went doolally and committed mass murder.

        But why? Don’t ask. What about that boys’ school? Don’t ask. Why did so many close to the scene become Trappists? Don’t ask. And why was the Cullen Report buried for 100 years? There above all, don’t ask.
        I'd heard about this before - how he was a procurer of boys for senior bods in Scottish Labour. I also remember a senior Labour MP being offered the job of secretary general of NATO was in someway related to this. Got him out of the way.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Gumbo Robot View Post
          I also remember a senior Labour MP being offered the job of secretary general of NATO was in someway related to this. Got him out of the UK.
          It's well known some "charity" workers and others sent overseas found other victims.
          "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

          Comment


            ...

            Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
            It's well known some "charity" workers and others sent overseas found other victims.
            This is still happening. I read of one convicted recently in this regard. Should have left him over there to suffer his sentence with some 'machete' discipline.

            Comment


              is this fascination with buggering young boys some sort of pining for the old days back in the boarding schools?

              seems to be a lot of these 'public figures' would have been playing hide the helmet with the head boy when they were younger and just could not grow out of it.

              problem is how many of todays public figures were the very people who were groomed back then - and only got their jobs on the back of their willingness to take it - and as such it is just a cycle which will repeat itself until someone breaks the chain.

              Comment


                what's the betting Plod raid Cilla's house now?
                Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by original PM View Post
                  is this fascination with buggering young boys some sort of pining for the old days back in the boarding schools?

                  seems to be a lot of these 'public figures' would have been playing hide the helmet with the head boy when they were younger and just could not grow out of it.

                  problem is how many of todays public figures were the very people who were groomed back then - and only got their jobs on the back of their willingness to take it - and as such it is just a cycle which will repeat itself until someone breaks the chain.
                  Ted Heath didn't go to a boarding school. He came from a comparatively humble background, and went to the local grammar school on a state scholarship.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by zeitghost
                    Ted "Grocer" Heath?
                    Definitely not. He was accused of being gay a few years ago and that was nonsense. He never had any interest in sex whatsoever.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Gumbo Robot View Post
                      Frederick Forsyth in the Express



                      I'd heard about this before - how he was a procurer of boys for senior bods in Scottish Labour. I also remember a senior Labour MP being offered the job of secretary general of NATO was in someway related to this. Got him out of the way.
                      The senior Labour MP George Robertson was "involved" in that he wrote to then Scottish Secretary Michael Forsyth to complain about Hamilton after his son went to one of Hamilton's summer camps. It would be useful to be more precise than "in someway related to this"; and less defamatory than "got him out of the way". Robertson actually tried to do something about Hamilton.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X