• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

what happened to free speech

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Most perceptive post d00000000000000000gh! It is a complex situation.

    I have known some Christians who are just so tolerant of everything (one even said "gays must have been made by god, so what's the problem?") that, while nodding politely, I am wondering what on earth is the point of them having a religion at all, what exactly do they believe in?

    Quite happy that the religious don't engage in gay marriages, have abortions, assisted suicide etc as long as they do not influence the law to prevent those not of their faith from doing so but appreciate that is difficult on some issues. If one views abortion as murder, for example, can you allow it whatever the faith of the mother may be? I suppose if people genuinely think others will go to hell they are failing in their Christian duty not to try to get them on the path to righteousness.

    Nevertheless, I think we have to compromise and work towards a society that permits people to follow their own beliefs as far as possible, while allowing those of faith (or none) to use persuasion if they want their own views to hold sway. That should be possible for Christianity, surely you only save a sinner by making him see the light? Simply forcing him into some approved behaviour and leaving his views and nature untouched won't save him from damnation.

    Unless we do that, the war will go on.
    bloggoth

    If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
    John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

    Comment


      Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
      That should be possible for Christianity, surely you only save a sinner by making him see the light? Simply forcing him into some approved behaviour and leaving his views and nature untouched won't save him from damnation.
      You are right, salvation by faith not by good deeds; i.e. forcing someone to obey laws doesn't earn you holy points

      However, as you point out with abortion standing by isn't a great option. Even with issues which don't appear to hurt anyone, if you believe in absolute morality then you have a duty to speak out against such practices. That doesn't mean you go telling gay people they're evil for instance, but does mean you might oppose laws which allow gay marriage... though the proper legal channels. [only using gay marriage as a semi-topical example, not because I have a beef about it]
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        Yes, this religion stuff is all very nice, but it's not what God told you, it's what some bloke has told you.

        It was written down, recycled, edited, translated then interpreted so many times you dont know what you are reading.

        Imagine you are cast adrift like rob crusoe, you believe in God, but you sort of forget all the detail, you dont have a holy book, or a preacher. So you find this fat pink animal with a corkscrew tail. is it a donkey, a cat or a labrador or a pig ? I dunno , but lets eat it anyways

        is that a sin ?

        some other bloke gets washed up. he believes in god.

        is it the same god as yours ? there is no way of knowing

        you offer him a bacon butty. is that a sin ? there is no way of knowing

        he might be an infidel, should you kill him ? there is no way of knowing

        no religious person can know any of this untill some bloke tells them what to think

        and they tell US about free speech ? ha



        (\__/)
        (>'.'<)
        ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

        Comment


          Originally posted by d000hg View Post
          To be honest I'm not sure it's possible to reconcile a strong faith [in many religions] with a tolerant free position. If the religion you fully believe to be true has facets which are in some way intolerant, then society telling you "you have freedom of religion as long as it doesn't conflict with our humanist position" doesn't get you anywhere... watering down your religion to avoid offending other people is not being true to your beliefs if they do come from a higher power (which you believe they do).
          This problem is symptomatic of the monothesitic religions where there is only the 'one'. Plurist religions such as Hinduism has less of an issue, or at least in my experience.

          I was talking to a Hindu friend a few years back about what he gets up to at xmas. Basically he said that they celebrate it and infact his father lamented the decline of religious programming around xmas and Easter. He father had decided when they came over here that they would add the western god to their pantheon and that was that.

          Before Christianity asserted itself with Jewish like zeal many different religions got on quite fine side by side in the Roman world.
          But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

          Comment


            Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
            Yes, this religion stuff is all very nice, but it's not what God told you, it's what some bloke has told you.

            It was written down, recycled, edited, translated then interpreted so many times you dont know what you are reading.

            Imagine you are cast adrift like rob crusoe, you believe in God, but you sort of forget all the detail, you dont have a holy book, or a preacher. So you find this fat pink animal with a corkscrew tail. is it a donkey, a cat or a labrador or a pig ? I dunno , but lets eat it anyways

            is that a sin ?

            some other bloke gets washed up. he believes in god.

            is it the same god as yours ? there is no way of knowing

            you offer him a bacon butty. is that a sin ? there is no way of knowing

            he might be an infidel, should you kill him ? there is no way of knowing

            no religious person can know any of this untill some bloke tells them what to think

            and they tell US about free speech ? ha



            Your entire supposition is based on the atheistic world-view that God can't talk directly to people. Which kind of makes further discussion difficult when several main religions say the opposite.
            If you don't believe in God then the entire point is moot, surely because if someone claims they have heard something directly from God, you'd dismiss that instantly.
            Originally posted by MaryPoppins
            I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
            Originally posted by vetran
            Urine is quite nourishing

            Comment


              Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
              This problem is symptomatic of the monothesitic religions where there is only the 'one'. Plurist religions such as Hinduism has less of an issue, or at least in my experience.

              I was talking to a Hindu friend a few years back about what he gets up to at xmas. Basically he said that they celebrate it and infact his father lamented the decline of religious programming around xmas and Easter. He father had decided when they came over here that they would add the western god to their pantheon and that was that.

              Before Christianity asserted itself with Jewish like zeal many different religions got on quite fine side by side in the Roman world.
              I don't see what that adds to the discussion. We could design a religion which is happy with other religions and doesn't say anything controversial (a bit like CofE ) but the key point is that if the believers believe their religion comes from a higher truth, they can't just decide to make it more relevant/popular without detracting from that truth.
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                I don't see what that adds to the discussion. We could design a religion which is happy with other religions and doesn't say anything controversial (a bit like CofE ) but the key point is that if the believers believe their religion comes from a higher truth, they can't just decide to make it more relevant/popular without detracting from that truth.
                Not controversial? Want to rethink that?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                  I don't see what that adds to the discussion. We could design a religion which is happy with other religions and doesn't say anything controversial (a bit like CofE ) but the key point is that if the believers believe their religion comes from a higher truth, they can't just decide to make it more relevant/popular without detracting from that truth.
                  As an interested atheist I think that is incorrect. All religions find themselves shaped by society. Those who say that God has declared homosexuality a sin and that this cannot change just because society has changed, forget how their churches (in a Christian context) have changed their views on slavery, marital rape, killing witches and various other historical social conventions - which they used to justify on scriptural grounds. Otherwise, why aren't conservative Christians pressing for the death penalty for witchcraft?

                  This can all be justified from within a religious mindset by stating that the Holy Spirit (and therfore God) is alive in the Church, so the Church is as much a source of God's revelation as scripture is.
                  The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

                  George Frederic Watts

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

                  Comment


                    http://youtu.be/J6ZdUZFy2BI

                    NSFW - Wear headphones!

                    Comment


                      Excellent idea. I will add the god of vodka and the goddess of huge bottom to my pantheon.
                      bloggoth

                      If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
                      John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X