Originally posted by Spacecadet
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Bored at Work
Collapse
X
-
Aye, sadly. Generally I much prefer it the other way round, but for an ogle or a one off then it's Ok by me.Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool Points -
Yeah, good call.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostDoes it rhyme with ripple?Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
-
-
Thats the ticketOriginally posted by Malcolm Buggeridge View PostYou mean you fired off a crackshot whilst seated at your desk?Coffee's for closersComment
-
It's easy to hide the fact that you 'nipped up', just by saying 'oohh its cold in here' or by cupping ones hands over ones boobies
but how does a guy disguise a two inch raging monster trying to burst out of his kecks ?
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Point it up and tuck into your belt, make sure the head doesn't popout though, might be considered a bit odd.Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostIt's easy to hide the fact that you 'nipped up', just by saying 'oohh its cold in here' or by cupping ones hands over ones boobies
but how does a guy disguise a two inch raging monster trying to burst out of his kecks ?

Comment
-
Most guys are not going to be looking so no worries....Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostIt's easy to hide the fact that you 'nipped up', just by saying 'oohh its cold in here' or by cupping ones hands over ones boobies
but how does a guy disguise a two inch raging monster trying to burst out of his kecks ?

Comment
-
Show off.Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Postbut how does a guy disguise a two inch raging monster trying to burst out of his kecks ?

Comment
-
A fit IT blokes part - you mean his magic screwdriverOriginally posted by MaryPoppins View PostNah. To stop me imagining the fit IT bloke's parts in my mouth.
Comment
-
That's my preferred option although the chest hairs get a little tickly.Originally posted by louie View PostPoint it up and tuck into your belt, make sure the head doesn't popout though, might be considered a bit odd.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment