Originally posted by adubya
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Third speeding ticket in six months!!
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
If you were concerned about those groups you'd be doing 20 mph or less and not slavishly following a speed limit, which is a maximum not a target. -
So, then, weight of car must be taken in account WRT to danger/speed?Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostEnergy, wot causes the damage, goes as 0.5 m v^2, so doubling the weight would double the potential for doing damage (work). Changes in momentum also goes linear with speed and mass, and that can be important too, since humans can only take so much acceleration too.
But they model human damage with a power 4 law IIRC rather than the square, possibly because humans will take a certain amount of damage before stuff goes snap.
If taken literally then so must tiredness of driver, age/responsiveness of driver, whether got wife nagging, whether got kids arguing, it's all subjective.
And nobody, nobody does 30mph in a 30, unless there's no other cars, no cams and you've had 3 NIPs in six months. then I'll do 30.
It's an error tax, that's all it is, a tax on making a slight misjudgement.Comment
-
BTW I don't put the cruise control at 30 and just sit back.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostIf you were concerned about those groups you'd be doing 20 mph or less and not slavishly following a speed limit, which is a maximum not a target.Comment
-
Where on earth do you live? Is it some kind of dystopian future netherworld? Or are you just exaggerating wildly?Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostDoing 30 mph in a 30 mph zone almost guarantees a tailgating session and the risk of being involved in an accident or a punch up. 33 mph is what you want. Hardly anyone does 30 mph. Grannies are exempt and just get hooted at.Comment
-
Yes, the only speeding tickets I have had here was when stressed out during the week of a house move, all only slightly over the limit. I was more pissed off with myself than the system, and I wasn't in fear of losing my licence.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostA colleague of mine overtook a bus on a 50mph stretch in his Porsche, touching briefly 80mph. Unfortunately he got caught by a radar trap. The police actually wrote on the report that the maneouver was in no way dangerous, and as a result he got the minimum possible fine. Thankfully, in this country, there's some discretion allowed. (And you can get "just over" tickets as many times as you like!)Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
I always do. So do the majority of motorists in the city where I live, and in all the other places I've driven. I think you have a nasty case of confirmation bias due to the need to justify your disregard for the law to yourself.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostAre you seriously saying you do 30 mph in a 30 mph zone?Comment
-
I don't know either but I certainly wouldn't want to live thereOriginally posted by NickFitz View PostWhere on earth do you live? Is it some kind of dystopian future netherworld? Or are you just exaggerating wildly?
Comment
-
There is this place you town folk call the country.Originally posted by NickFitz View PostWhere on earth do you live? Is it some kind of dystopian future netherworld? Or are you just exaggerating wildly?Comment
-
Yeah, a heavy car usually beats a light car hands down in accidents, so weight is important in that respect. But as weights are otherwise constant, the damage each will sustain is mainly related to the square of their speeds.Originally posted by stek View PostSo, then, weight of car must be taken in account WRT to danger/speed?
If taken literally then so must tiredness of driver, age/responsiveness of driver, whether got wife nagging, whether got kids arguing, it's all subjective.
And nobody, nobody does 30mph in a 30, unless there's no other cars, no cams and you've had 3 NIPs in six months. then I'll do 30.
It's an error tax, that's all it is, a tax on making a slight misjudgement.Comment
-
So do u do 27mph on the speedo to allow for error? Do you check the speedo while driving at 30 or 27? Can you be sure you are being vigilant if you do check, and can you be sure you are within the limit if you don't check and are therefore not vigilant?Originally posted by NickFitz View PostI always do. So do the majority of motorists in the city where I live, and in all the other places I've driven. I think you have a nasty case of confirmation bias due to the need to justify your disregard for the law to yourself.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Comment