Originally posted by shaunbhoy
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Is "911" the United States "Holocaust"?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostSoooo, "widely believed" has now become "That Osama Bin Laden, it was him what done it Guv'nor!"
HTH
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
Comment
-
Are you crazy? Every fule kno' that it was a conspiracy of the US government, in order to justify going to war in Afghanistan and then Iraq, and the Patriot Act. The buildings were rigged months earlier to be blown up. There were only two planes involved. The pentagon was hit by a missile, not a plane. The pittsburgh "plane" turned out to be a hole in the ground and WTC7 was also demolished by pre-planted thermite.
Did I miss anything?Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostAre you crazy? Every fule kno' that it was a conspiracy of the US government, in order to justify going to war in Afghanistan and then Iraq, and the Patriot Act. The buildings were rigged months earlier to be blown up. There were only two planes involved. The pentagon was hit by a missile, not a plane. The pittsburgh "plane" turned out to be a hole in the ground and WTC7 was also demolished by pre-planted thermite.
Did I miss anything?
Fact, (so far)there is no proof that Osama Bin Laden was involved in "911". The US Government rolls out the "Widely Believed" statement every so often but there has so far never been any proof.Comment
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostDon't be attributing that kind of bollocks to me...Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostFact, (so far)there is no proof that Osama Bin Laden was involved in "911". The US Government rolls out the "Widely Believed" statement every so often but there has so far never been any proof.
Bin Laden knew the accusation and was a wanted person in connection - he could have surrendered himself anytime during 10 years or even declare in one of his many vile broadcasts that he had nothing to do with it, yet he used those opportunities to praise those who caused 9/11.
History will be the judge of it... in any case it will never remember pathetic little tasteless foul mouthed tulip known as Churchill (AKA SupremeSpod) on CUK.
HTHLast edited by AtW; 13 September 2011, 20:22.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostA
Bin Laden knew the accusation and was a wanted person in connection - he could have surrendered himself anytime during 10 years or even declare in one of his many vile broadcasts that he had nothing to do with it, yet he used those opportunities to praise those who caused 9/11.
HTH
Be that as it may - there is no hard evidence from the US to establish that he master minded Sep 11th - so
here in turn as what he had to say about the accusations -
September 17, 2001:
"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons. I have been living in the Islamic emirate of Afghanistan and following its leaders' rules.
The current leader does not allow me to exercise such operations."
So how do we make sense of the above statement?
Or how do we make sense of his second public statement in regards to 9/11, given on
October 16, 2001:
"I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States.
As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act.
Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people.
Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle."Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 13 September 2011, 21:57.Comment
-
Why did he not maintain his innocent for next 10 years after 9/11?
He seemed very comfortable with making videos and audio recording calling to attack western targets - what does such incitement to murder gives you in court in this country?Comment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostIt's not all about you, you know. Sheesh, I display a coat for general display, and you pronounce it a perfect fit.
On past experience of your knee-jerk reactions how else was one to take your statement?
Originally posted by AtW View PostApparently there is no written proof that Hitler signed off "the final solution", meaning that he did not sign any documents to that effect however on the balance there is enough evidence to shoot Hitler in the head at the earliest possible opportunity.
Bin Laden knew the accusation and was a wanted person in connection - he could have surrendered himself anytime during 10 years or even declare in one of his many vile broadcasts that he had nothing to do with it, yet he used those opportunities to praise those who caused 9/11.
History will be the judge of it... in any case it will never remember pathetic little tasteless foul mouthed tulip known as Churchill (AKA SupremeSpod) on CUK.
HTHLast edited by Churchill; 14 September 2011, 06:10.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment