Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Dont worry about it sweety, carry on baiting them, its fun to wind them up. Throw in a couple of indeffensible points and see who ends up ranting while you pop off for a chablis at lunch.
You saddo IT geek. Do you have to resort to an IT forum to pick up women?
So what you're saying is that your "point of view" is as valid as all the great scientists who laid down the basics of statistical theory and practice. In other words, they were wrong and you're right and statistics is useless.
Wow! This is a real mathematical breakthrough. I think it's known as a paradigm shift. When are you going to collect the Nobel prize that is undoubtedly due to you?
what I am saying is that I have studied statistics as well as having used them in a practical sense. I know that, if used correctly, they can produce meaningful results. however, in an awful lot of cases they are reported incorrectly and misleadingly. I also know that it is very easy to skew results to your desired outcome.
don't be patronising... it's not big and it's not clever. We were having a sensible conversation and you have to debase it with sarcasm... hmmm yes really adds strength to your argument
Are you a Statistican Jane? Would you listen to someone that was?
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
Dont worry about it sweety, carry on baiting them, its fun to wind them up. Throw in a couple of indeffensible points and see who ends up ranting while you pop off for a chablis at lunch.
I think we have already had the indefensible point that statistics as a science is rubbish. Time to throw away all that quality control bunkum, all that agricultural research rubbish, all those medicines, all those experimental designs, all those epidemilogical studies, Bird flu? what a load of rubbish, just take some paracetemol.
The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.
But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”
I think we have already had the indefensible point that statistics as a science is rubbish. Time to throw away all that quality control bunkum, all that agricultural research rubbish, all those medicines, all those experimental designs, all those epidemilogical studies, Bird flu? what a load of rubbish, just take some paracetemol.
Are you a Statistican Jane? Would you listen to someone that was?
I think we have already had the indefensible point that statistics as a science is rubbish. Time to throw away all that quality control bunkum, all that agricultural research rubbish, all those medicines, all those experimental designs, all those epidemilogical studies, Bird flu? what a load of rubbish, just take some paracetemol.
hmmm distorting an argument to suit your point of view... wouldn't be a statistician would you?
Comment