Property boom

[sasguru]

ok?
enough already?

I'm not at all saying that the statistical calcualtions are wrong or that they don't mean anything, I am talking about how people USE statisitics

Well you are on an IT geeks site you know. You must know that we're all pedants and sticklers for accuracy

[janey]

Well you are on an IT geeks site you know. You must know that we're all pedants and sticklers for accuracy

me too... I would expect people to actually READ what I've said rather than make assumptions

[Bagpuss]

me too... I would expect people to actually READ what I've said rather than make assumptions

I did read what you said, and agree with some of it. Some of it was wrong, having studied the subject to Masters level and working in that area for years I have some knowledge of how the subject slots together. As with a lot of people on Bulletin Boards you take critism as a personal afront even if it's a domain where you are not an expert. I am not just picking on you.
Personally I like to remain open minded in any area where I do not practice. If someone has experience in that area I listen to what they have to say I am not concieted enough to extrapolate a little knowledge I have gained in an area to the whole of the subject.

[sasguru]

I did read what you said, and agree with some of it. Some of it was wrong, having studied the subject to Masters level and working in that area for years I have some knowledge of how the subject slots together. As with a lot of people on Bulletin Boards you take critism as a personal afront even if it's a domain where you are not an expert. I am not just picking on you.
Personally I like to remain open minded in any area where I do not practice. If someone has experience in that area I listen to what they have to say I am not concieted enough to extrapolate a little knowledge I have gained in an area to the whole of the subject.

C'mon BagAPussy! A little bit too earnest, aren't we? You won't score with our Janey like that

[Bagpuss]

C'mon BagAPussy! A little bit too earnest, aren't we? You won't score with our Janey like that

Hate to disappoint you SAS, but I've got a partner and I regularly see her breasts.

[janey]

I did read what you said, and agree with some of it. Some of it was wrong, having studied the subject to Masters level and working in that area for years I have some knowledge of how the subject slots together. As with a lot of people on Bulletin Boards you take critism as a personal afront even if it's a domain where you are not an expert. I am not just picking on you.
Personally I like to remain open minded in any area where I do not practice. If someone has experience in that area I listen to what they have to say I am not concieted enough to extrapolate a little knowledge I have gained in an area to the whole of the subject.

I haven't taken anything as a personal afront at all... believe me my life just ain't that sad. However it does annoy me when people who are claiming to be "experts" have to resort to being patronising and sacrastic when someone argues against their opinion.

[Lucifer Box]

Hate to disappoint you SAS, but I've got a partner and I regularly see her breasts.

For the record, I regularly see Bagpuss' partner's breasts as well (I'm not sure he knows about it though).

[DaveB]

Hate to disappoint you SAS, but I've got a partner and I regularly see her breasts.

And it only costs him £50 a time

[sasguru]

Hate to disappoint you SAS, but I've got a partner and I regularly see her breasts.

Does the frequency of your seeing her breasts follow a Poisson distribution?

[sasguru]

For the record, I regularly see Bagpuss' partner's breasts as well (I'm not sure he knows about it though).

Bloody hell Bagpuss. You haven't married David Contractors mum, have you?