• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BNP Members list leaked on the internet

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Alf W View Post
    Analysis of the membership spreadsheet...

    Patels? None.
    Mohammed (or variant of)? None
    Singh? None

    In fact I'm not seeing any remotely asian looking names on there.
    dunno. 'Christian White' - could come from the kybher pass. possibly




    (\__/)
    (>'.'<)
    ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

    Comment


      Originally posted by Platypus View Post
      Dude, I was trying to draw a comparison with something Mich the Tester was saying with something that everyone would immediately agree was an outrageous comment. Looks like I got the outrageous part right.

      Re: is it illegal to be gay... well that's exactly my point, no it isn't. As far as I know being a racist isn't illegal either, so it wouldn't be right to sack someone JUST for being on the BNP list. Which Mich was advocating.

      Sort of thread-within-a-thread here, please feel free to read back half-a-dozen posts and catch up with this particular sub-discussion.
      Thanks, dude.

      In Xeno's world, being gay is ok, but being racist is not.

      If people get sacked for being on that list then fine by me. Good luck to them in their employment tribunals.
      Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.

      Comment


        I got sacked for being on this list (CUK) and I'm not even racist!
        The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

        But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

        Comment


          Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
          I got sacked for being on this list (CUK) and I'm not even racist!
          No, you got sacked for your actions (posting during work time), not for the fact you were on CUK list!

          Comment


            Originally posted by tay View Post
            Is that an intentionally stupid question?

            Your view is the one closest aligned to suspension of the democratic process.
            Is this an intentionally argumentative post?

            Check 1: is it written by tay?

            YES! Confirmed.

            The annoying little oik, tay, is joining in! Great!
            Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.

            Comment


              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              No, you got sacked for your actions (posting during work time), not for the fact you were on CUK list!
              Could you prove that in a court of law?
              The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

              But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

              Comment


                Originally posted by tay View Post
                Fine, seen as the slower amongst you need an answer to this question



                No


                happy now?
                It was a hard question, but you got there eventually.

                Well done.

                Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Xenophon View Post
                  Is this an intentionally argumentative post?

                  Check 1: is it written by tay?

                  YES! Confirmed.

                  The annoying little oik, tay, is joining in! Great!
                  please use the correct terminology - ILST


                  irritating little tulip-tick



                  (\__/)
                  (>'.'<)
                  ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
                    Just because they're BNP members does not necessarily mean that they are all racist. Some are just fed up with indigenous folk being treated second class, having their jobs undercut by cheap immigrant labour and general living standards falling. Many of those people that are fed up are actually black or asian.
                    Indigenous people being treated second class? Don’t give me that; it’s standard nonsense everywhere and it just isn’t true. Fair enough to complain about tulipty economic policies, but if you lose your job to an unskilled immigrant with a dodgy grasp of English, you need to take a hard look at your own skills and work out how to improve yourself before blaming someone else.

                    I came to the Netherlands with no grasp of the language, not much money, a crappy certificate of higher education and in the middle of a recession. If I could manage to learn the language, get professional qualifications, get a job and then start my own business, with no state handouts, no free higher education as a foreigner, and the only job opening at the start being labouring on a building site, then there is no excuse whatsoever for native citizens who’ve had the benefit of free education, subsidized training, free healthcare and all the other chances a western society offers.

                    Sure people are fed up, but to blame immigrants for their problems is just weak and cowardly, and that’s another reason I wouldn’t want to employ them; they’re too bloody indolent to make use of all the opportunities they’ve had to better themselves, and I don’t need people like that in my business.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                      please use the correct terminology - ILST


                      irritating little tulip-tick



                      Apologies

                      Noted.
                      Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X