• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BNP Members list leaked on the internet

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    Fein
    Féin

    Comment


      Originally posted by Bob Dalek View Post
      Féin
      I don't know how to get a fada on my keyboard
      Bazza gets caught
      Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."

      CUK University Challenge Champions 2010

      Comment


        Originally posted by Platypus View Post
        I hate to chip in here but isn't "unsavoury" somewhat subjective?
        That is fair enough. If the truth be told I couldn't decide what word to use there.

        What I'm getting at, is does AtW not care about ANY party as long as it is a legal party?
        Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Xenophon View Post
          So are you happy for there to be parties, as long as they are legal, that hold any views, no matter how unsavoury?
          No, I won't be at those parties, however if they are legal such parties would be held and people will be able to attend those parties without fear they lose their jobs.

          Originally posted by sasguru View Post
          What if due process results in their election after which they suspend due process?
          That's why population should be armed like in USA.

          BNP has zero chance of electorate victory, so making them look "in the right" like they are now is very wrong - the best strategy about BNP is ignore them and certainly not to give them any chance to even remotely look being targeted and unfairly treated. Frankly I'd rather have legal BNP than illegal underground party that would be far more inclined to violence.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Xenophon View Post
            That is fair enough. If the truth be told I couldn't decide what word to use there.

            What I'm getting at, is does AtW not care about ANY party as long as it is a legal party?
            unwholesome
            notorious
            shady
            dodgy
            nefarious

            actually, I quite liked unsavoury


            (\__/)
            (>'.'<)
            ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

            Comment


              Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
              unwholesome
              notorious
              shady
              dodgy
              nefarious

              actually, I quite liked unsavoury


              Thanks.

              Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Xenophon View Post
                What I'm getting at, is does AtW not care about ANY party as long as it is a legal party?
                There are plenty of legal firms that do things I disagree with - my position is that on one hand I personally don't take part in it, and on another hand sometimes there is a case to argue that their activities should be made illegal (hedge funds for example), only after that can something legally be done about those people. Until such point they have every right to exist as you or me.

                Same goes for political parties - I've seen way too often such witchhunts backfire big time.

                ---

                I mean, what next then, should the accused murderers be killed on a spot? Maybe they should not get lawyers? Maybe we should not bother get proper evidence etc? Ian Huntley in my view did far more bad than BNP, yet he had expensive lawyers, due process was followed etc etc. Frankly Labour is fking up this country real bad - they should be the focus of attention.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Xenophon View Post
                  What I'm getting at, is does AtW not care about ANY party as long as it is a legal party?
                  Well that's tricky isn't it, the line is often wide and grey even where it appears to be black and white (no racist pun intended).

                  i.e. if you outlaw X then perhaps you should outlaw X + 0.01 ? And so on until you outlaw all views

                  So perhaps the principle of "everyone is entitled to their views" is the best position, regardless of how distasteful others may find those views ?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Xenophon View Post
                    You're right to apologise. Like sas says, democracy can go wrong.
                    Aaaaggghhhh!!!! No - it can't go wrong. It just looks that way to those who don't like what others have voted for.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                      unwholesome
                      notorious
                      shady
                      dodgy
                      nefarious

                      actually, I quite liked unsavoury
                      Apart from "notorious" all are equally subjective

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X