Originally posted by Old Greg
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Glasgow Bombers...
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
It's in the interpretation to the present way of living. Christians adapt the teachings to the present, Muslims are being taught they are literal and there lies the problem. -
That's a nasty cough you have there TLG. You want to be careful!Originally posted by The Lone Gunman(pbuh)
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
I suppose if I was in a place where people were being run-through, blown up or hung - then I might be inclined to leave...to live and fight another day.
But I hardly imagine the current climate meeting the threshold criteria you quoted.
So again:
blah blah blah they can leave blah blah blah if they want to blah blah.
rather catchy don't you think?McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."Comment
-
That is the paradox I mentioned earlier. It is also mentioned in that piece from the Guardian in an earlier link.Originally posted by lilelvis2000The UK is hardly a place where muslims are persecuted. Perhaps the gun happy Police are persecuting them, but then they use their silly powers just because they can.
We are all the enemy because we elected the Government that sends troops to kill Muslim brothers across the world. If we were not guilty then these suicide bombers would be killing innocents and therefore eternaly damned.
If a Muslim supports these bombers then they have to believe we are the enemy.
If we are the enemy then they should not live amongst us.
If we are not the enemy they may live amongst us and try to convert us. If there are enough of them to take power then they should do so and implement Sharia law. It is then a matter of time till we are given the choice of convert or die.
Islam is playing the long game, always has.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
Unsurprisingly, you oversimplify the problem. Most employers simply wouldn't employ these people - they have a range of problems, whether medical or social which simply make unattractive to employers. Taking money away from them won't make them any more attractive to employers. They need support through education and training for one thing - which will cost money. I'd be happy to see their benefits conditional on participation in education and training and I'd apply that to people of all races equally, not make some differentiation between 'us' and 'them' - we are all 'us'. Meanwhile, the jobs being filled by new immigrants are not 'indigenous peoples' jobs' - they are gaps in the labour market that would otherwise have remained unfilled.Originally posted by Causus DeliThey need to be given a chance, just to apply our standards (and discard) to these uneducated people is crass stupidity. Stop their dough if they don't work for it, if it ain't worth working make it worth it. More and more belligerents are imported because 'we need them' - bollox like a hole in the head, who needs them to sell sandwiches and pull pints, we have our own people - pay them to do it not sit on their arses? No more students, no more imams, no more grannies, no more relatives, no more asylum seekers - WE DON'T NEED THEM. We have a problem, action is required.
Alternatively, I suppose you could put them in uniform and send them on road building projects.Comment
-
This is a classic example of our differences, if any Muslim is reading this he will be highly offended and many would be far worse with consequences if they could. I recall once I referred to arabic as squiggle on a forum some years ago and I got some serious threats. We do not understand and they are very intolerant as also shown by their disdain for our women, habits, lack of God, ascendancy, just about owt really.Originally posted by shaunbhoyThat's a nasty cough you have there TLG. You want to be careful!

Comment
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoyThat's a nasty cough you have there TLG. You want to be careful!

You will burn in hell for that one infidel.
I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
Hope you're this excited laterOriginally posted by The Lone Gunman
You will burn in hell for that one infidel.
Fiscal nomad it's legal.Comment
-
Have I missed another appointment? I havent read all threads and posts today. Shame on me.Originally posted by alreadypackedHope you're this excited later
I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
Employers would be subsidised, then the burden is shared. At the moment it's all on me as a taxpayer. We certainly don't need any more education, this generation have god knows what qualifications but can't wipe their arses.Originally posted by Old GregUnsurprisingly, you oversimplify the problem. Most employers simply wouldn't employ these people - they have a range of problems, whether medical or social which simply make unattractive to employers. Taking money away from them won't make them any more attractive to employers. They need support through education and training for one thing - which will cost money. I'd be happy to see their benefits conditional on participation in education and training and I'd apply that to people of all races equally, not make some differentiation between 'us' and 'them' - we are all 'us'. Meanwhile, the jobs being filled by new immigrants are not 'indigenous peoples' jobs' - they are gaps in the labour market that would otherwise have remained unfilled.
Alternatively, I suppose you could put them in uniform and send them on road building projects.
Look I can't write a book here why not try and see between the lines?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment