• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Glasgow Bombers...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Old Greg
    There is a difference between unemployable and worthless. I want them given a chance to get skills and stsrt to fulfill their intention.

    Employing an immigrant does not cost any more than employing a non-immigrant.
    Could you explain what skills it is that a sandwich maker needs, a road sweep needs, perhaps a cleaner, a waitress, a van driver, a gardener, .... These do not need some bit of paper that says you can do it, I would think supervision for a few hours in most cases.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Old Greg
      But the non-immigrant would be doing feck-all anyway - cos noone would employ him/her.
      Well perhaps we need to stop paying him to be unemployable thus forcing him to make himself employable or starve!! Obviously assuming his/her Human Rights are not infringed.
      “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

      Comment


        Originally posted by Old Greg
        It makes it suspicious because of their real agenda.
        What happened to the doctor bombers getting beaten up by weegies on a fag break?

        Crporate state employment policy and immigration - WTF?

        Comment


          Originally posted by Old Greg
          Ditto my last post.
          This goes off on a whole other tack, but we should not be writing off our own, we should be training them and placing them in work. Possibly by subsidising employers or possibly making foreign imports far more expensive.
          Employers are taking the piss by paying below standard wages so that locals can't take the job and then employing cheap foreignors.
          It is not always the unskilled either.
          A mate is a local mechanic recently made redundant (dont go that route) replaced with a Pole.
          Other lads have left because Poles have reset all diagnostic machines so they cant read em.
          Some of these guys are unemployed, not unemployable.
          I am not qualified to give the above advice!

          The original point and click interface by
          Smith and Wesson.

          Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

          Comment


            Originally posted by Causus Deli
            Would you not employ somebody to make sandwiches if it cost you nothing more than basic training (which you would have to do anyway)? Simple equation for the employer is it worth paying full price for an imported unit or just a little effort for a home grown one? Then perhaps after 3/12 the subsidy is half and after 12/12 nowt??? Well you know I think I would take the cheap option and see how it goes.
            Let's put ourselves in the position of the employer. Who do you want to make the sandwich:

            Bright young keen Polish person who has come to the country to work all the hours God sends etc. and get some work together. With no subsidy.

            'Member of the underclass' with poor numeracy, literacy, motivation - patchy work record (will they turn up on time or at all? Employer has orders to fulfill. What will it do for morale to have people not pulling their wait etc.?). With subsidy.

            I happen to think the answer is the first. I'm not writng off the 'member of the underclass' - I want to help them. And they need skills (and maybe that will get them used to the routine of turning up on time every day and get some motivation.)

            Now take the Pole out of the equation (let's say they weren't allowed into the country). I think the employer still will not want the second option. They'll just have an unfilled vacancy.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Causus Deli
              No it doesn't but you still have to pay the guy sat on his arse.
              But they'll be doing that anyway (cos employers just won't employ them - see above posts.)

              Comment


                Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
                Just because it is BNP policy does not make it bad policy.
                Except of course how it will be implemented. By a marxist/socialist government.
                McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
                Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Old Greg
                  But they'll be doing that anyway (cos employers just won't employ them - see above posts.)
                  When the choice is employ a scrote or go bust, they will employ scrotes.
                  I am not qualified to give the above advice!

                  The original point and click interface by
                  Smith and Wesson.

                  Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

                  Comment


                    Did it ever occur, that we should penalise the dole sitters when a suitable job comes along and they don't even bother to apply, or in the gov't opinion make a suitable effort to obtain the job?

                    And how the heck did I end up on this tack?
                    McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
                    Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
                      When the choice is employ a scrote or go bust, they will employ scrotes.
                      Unfortunately all unemployed are thus labelled, there may well be a proportion of these people who could not be trusted to do a worthwhile job. With a bit of encouragement I believe a large proportion would do it. Well as you say we should make them damn well do it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X