So yes, Hitler was kind of democratically elected but he then immediately destroyed democracy. This is what fascists do. They use democracy to get power and then smash it. So I'd say they are mutually contradictory.
Hitler's electoral success was mainly due to the German population's disanchantment with the terms of treaty of Versailles - his promise to restore national honour and the re-arnament of Germany and the employment prospects thereof (guns before butter) were no doubt popular.
My point that democracy and fascism are not mutally exclusive remains,however this is true only for democratic states which have a powerful millitary and desire economic expansion - or need to maintain the economic status quo .
Observing the leading most powerful democratics states one can readily see elements of fascism in their Foreign Policy - and to some extent these states have preserved what I would term the 'illusion' of democracy.
Therefore it is possible to have, in effect, a fascist government under the guise of a democracy- this is a rather shrewd move as it lessens the chances of unrest at home and gives a seemingly moral ballast to such actions as the unprovoked invasion of nation states.
So fascism and democracy need not be mutally exclusive.
For example in the USA there are two political partys to represent the interests of 500 million people - why only two political parties ?
No matter whom you vote for - the Government always gets in.
Hitler's electoral success was mainly due to the German population's disanchantment with the terms of treaty of Versailles - his promise to restore national honour and the re-arnament of Germany and the employment prospects thereof (guns before butter) were no doubt popular.
My point that democracy and fascism are not mutally exclusive remains,however this is true only for democratic states which have a powerful millitary and desire economic expansion - or need to maintain the economic status quo .
Observing the leading most powerful democratics states one can readily see elements of fascism in their Foreign Policy - and to some extent these states have preserved what I would term the 'illusion' of democracy.
Therefore it is possible to have, in effect, a fascist government under the guise of a democracy- this is a rather shrewd move as it lessens the chances of unrest at home and gives a seemingly moral ballast to such actions as the unprovoked invasion of nation states.
So fascism and democracy need not be mutally exclusive.
For example in the USA there are two political partys to represent the interests of 500 million people - why only two political parties ?
No matter whom you vote for - the Government always gets in.

Comment