• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Sensible policies for a sensible electorate

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Sensible policies for a sensible electorate

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cies-poll.html

    Click image for larger version

Name:	94550875-14328787-image-a-33_1737967888497.jpg
Views:	125
Size:	56.0 KB
ID:	4303939



    Click image for larger version

Name:	94550943-14328787-image-a-39_1737968066064.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	110.3 KB
ID:	4303940


    From declaring a border emergency to backing fossil fuel production, British voters have supported a raft of Donald Trump's policies in a blind polling test.

    Some 2,000 voters were asked for their thoughts about the US President's views on migration, the environment and diversity - without being told they were his policies.

    Those being surveyed by polling firm Opinium were questioned on excerpts from Mr Trump's inauguration speech in Washington DC last Monday, adapted for the UK.

    #2
    I must admit I don't see the point to this? These policies could apply to any country and people are only going to vote on their thoughts on that policy. Not sure if the Trump element makes an iota of difference. I very much most of the 2k people asked have a clue what's going on in the USA to tailor their votes to the problems over there? Or have I read it wrong?

    I don't think this tells us anything we didn't already know does it?

    That said, I think if they opened that up to more than 2k people covering all demographics in the UK some of those numbers would rise sharply. I think I read somewhere that highly educated people were less likely to vote so more representation of angry people in voting so expand that 2k and you are going to get a disproportionate view in some areas, propably immigration for a start.

    Vaguley interesting but not sure it's worth much.
    Last edited by northernladuk; 27 January 2025, 12:01.
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
      I must admit I don't see the point to this? These policies could apply to any country and people are only going to vote on their thoughts on that policy. Not sure if the Trump element makes an iota of difference. I very much most of the 2k people asked have a clue what's going on in the USA to tailor their votes to the problems over there? Or have I read it wrong?

      I don't think this tells us anything we didn't already know does it?
      They were presented to UK voters as UK initiatives. The point is to show the Policies that the Orange one is proposing would be popular in the UK.

      Comment


        #4
        The questions are weasel words. I remember Camelot increasing the price of the lottery tickets because that asked the public "do you want bigger prizes?".
        You could ask office workers "do you want more space to work in" and then claim 99% of workers voted for redundancies.
        "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by vetran View Post

          They were presented to UK daily fail readers as UK initiatives. The point is to show the Policies that the Orange one is proposing would be popular to the moronic majority of the UK.
          ftfy

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Paddy View Post
            The questions are weasel words. I remember Camelot increasing the price of the lottery tickets because that asked the public "do you want bigger prizes?".
            You could ask office workers "do you want more space to work in" and then claim 99% of workers voted for redundancies.
            have you ever read a manifesto?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post

              I don't understand polls because the Slaver and Labour party tells me what to think. I object to the Mail because it has too few pictures. The Telegraph's words are over 6 letters, GBNews has a UK flag
              https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...s-tariffs-dei/

              https://www.gbnews.com/politics/dona...-gender-stance


              Lets see if he is less popular than syphilis by the 100 days like Keir Barmy.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by vetran View Post

                They were presented to UK voters as UK initiatives. The point is to show the Policies that the Orange one is proposing would be popular in the UK.
                Try find me a western country that doesn't have exactly the same policies with probably the same percentages. They are hardly ground breaking.
                'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Promises, promises. * all ever gets done.
                  bloggoth

                  If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
                  John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

                    Try find me a western country that doesn't have exactly the same policies with probably the same percentages. They are hardly ground breaking.
                    Pretty much any western country has DEI, affirmative action, restricted speech and energy dependency on Russia.

                    You might have been right in the 80s.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X