On a scale of 1 to 10, we're Fcked!

[mogga71]

I do not use ordinary savings accounts for investing cash, because the interest rates are not attractive enough. Although, I understand if you need instant or relatively short notice access to cash.

I read this book recently on income investing, and I found it very helpful in giving an overall picture of where fixed income yield can be found, and at what risks, and the relative risk picture versus other investing options. "The Income Factory". As far as I can tell the author is not selling you anything, just written a half-decent book on the subject:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/...?ie=UTF8&psc=1

I have looked up many of the funds mentioned in the book and they are available through tax-free investment wrappers ISAs, SIPPs.

TBH I thought this book was pretty pants (for me anyway) in respect that he purposely ignores the 'pure growth' agenda as he calls it a recent phenomenon. The author is only really concerned with income assets which take ages to compound to achieve a good total. Would have been infinitely better off just investing in the Nasdaq 100 ETF for the past 20 years for fantastic and easy growth.

[churchillsnip]

Which markets are you talking about because the major indices and FX rates are just showing fairly normal variations?

The ten year gilt has taken a knock of a percent or two today - not exactly unexpected and still within the same range that its been in over the last couple of years. Truss caused a ten to fifteen percent dive in a couple of days

Pretty cheap considering they're buying the (infrastructure) money printer with it.

[vetran]

He was posting what Lying Auntie beeb told him, and it was before the budget was announced. Just FUD being spread by the far left to its unquestioning believers.

FTFY

[willendure]

[willendure]

A chart for you of the 10 year gilt yield.

You can see the Truss/Kwartang peak in Sep 2022. Personally, I think it was only tangentially their fault, for one thing the peak started well before their budget, it was also a timing thing with some bond selling by BofE. Anyway....

No major shift today.

But also has been rising ever since interest rates were cut, and in the US too. Anticipation of increase inflation.

[woody1]

Would have been infinitely better off just investing in the Nasdaq 100 ETF for the past 20 years for fantastic and easy growth.

Yes but where would we be infinitely better off investing for the next 20 years?

Not that it matters in my case because I'll be lucky to make it another few.

[willendure]

Yes but where would we be infinitely better off investing for the next 20 years?

Not that it matters in my case because I'll be lucky to make it another few.

Exactly. Its easy to be an armchair investor looking back over the last 20 years and pat yourself on the back, even though you did not hold the nasdaq for those 20 years.

The point is, you can get better fixed returns than a savings account, and the risk is likely a lot smaller than you might think. Bonds have default risk, but equities have the same default risk too plus the entrepeneurial risk. So there is a spectrum of risk. The "great moderation" has ended, and some commentators are saying that the extra yield gained from the equity risk could be a lot smaller over the next 20 years.

Its fixed income, but you achieve growth by reinvesting the income, so it compounds.

I really do think it is a good book. Particularly as it covers a wide range of possible sources of fixed income, and gives very specific recommendations on the funds to use, their rates of return and so on.

[jamesbrown]

Pretty big self off in Gilts again today, up to 4.55% on the 10yr at one point, investors seem worried about the planned tax/spend/borrowing. Treasury will be watching this nervously...

[willendure]

Pretty big self off in Gilts again today, up to 4.55% on the 10yr at one point, investors seem worried about the planned tax/spend/borrowing. Treasury will be watching this nervously...

When looking at the 10 year UK chart, always put the 10 year US chart alongside. You can see the rise there is coordinated with a similar sized rise in the US 10 year. In other words, it is not specifically a UK issue. I don't think the markets have quite the negative interpretation of the budget that you think:

[jamesbrown]

When looking at the 10 year UK chart, always put the 10 year US chart alongside. You can see the rise there is coordinated with a similar sized rise in the US 10 year. In other words, it is not specifically a UK issue. I don't think the markets have quite the negative interpretation of the budget that you think:

On the contrary, Treasuries are roughly the level they were at the start of the week, not so for Gilts, which are much higher. Also, while there is indeed a correlation, they can certainly decouple during election cycles with an election a few days away in the U.S., so I wouldn't pay much attention to that correlation right now. Anyway, my interpretation is the same as the interpretation in most reputable sources of financial information - the budget has not gone down particularly well, and for obvious reasons (massively increased borrowing, massively increased taxes, anemic growth projections, and a tiny amount of headroom that has already been eroded in half by recent Gilt movements). As an aside, I am not particularly partisan w/r to the politics of all this. I hate them all equally, but I would prefer the economy to turn around more than I hate them