Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I pointed out a member of the House of Lords can't go into the House of Commons to answer questions.
So the MP that represents you and the MP that represents me if they have parliamentary questions for the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs they will not get answers in the Commons.
They can however get answers for ministers under him if they are MPs.
Last edited by SueEllen; 13 November 2023, 13:50.
Reason: Edited - removed second State
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR
I read that today thought to myself "what else can they think of to make them loose ever harder?" then realised, no one on benefits is actually voting Tory anyway, so I doubt that makes a tiny bit of difference to their popularity.
I read that today thought to myself "what else can they think of to make them loose ever harder?" then realised, no one on benefits is actually voting Tory anyway, so I doubt that makes a tiny bit of difference to their popularity.
Attacking benefits is a classic easy win. The taxes is what traditional tory voters will be pissed about. The pension changes benefit next to no one really.
Then it's autumn statement next week. Attack on benefits and no change to taxes?
It would be funny if we get denied the Rwanda deal and the EU implement one. Italy has just done some kind of deal with Albania.
There seems to be a lot of pressure to reduce the fiscal drag, according to The Times and other outlets it seems to be hitting people for just doing the same job and also hitting productivity and ambition. The removing of Child Benefit along with the higher rate at the same time is a big disincentive unless you're going a long way over 52K. And the rate around 105K is a real cliff edge. Its ok saying they can afford it but not much use if they don't bother earning it.
But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger
Comment