Originally posted by Paddy
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Good start magic Auntie
Collapse
X
-
Yes they could have, and we could have veto'ed everything. However in 2016 the EU elites were clearly on a trajectory that the UK disagreed with and at best they were paying lip service to any dissenters. It seems now the new elites are waking up to the idea that they can't just force and bully federalisation onto all members. -
A moot point in the UK's case as I'm sure you have heard of the Good Friday Agreement.Originally posted by vetran View Post
oh so being an EU member doesn't require you to be a member of the ECHR? Can you quote a reference?
(Worth noting I did a quick google and found this - https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/eu...ns-and-answers In other words the EU hasn't even joined yet. )Last edited by SueEllen; 22 September 2023, 12:49."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
The good Friday agreement is to allow the UK to leave the EU and continued membership of the ECHR after we left the EU was an agreed term.Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
A moot point in the UK's case as I'm sure you have heard of the Good Friday Agreement.
(Worth noting I did a quick google and found this - https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/eu...ns-and-answers In other words the EU hasn't even joined yet. )
TO BE A MEMBER OF THE EU REQUIRES YOU TO BE A MEMBER OF ECHR - REPEATED LOUDER FOR THE HARD OF HEARING.
On second point You know the EU isn't a country? The move towards wishing to be recognised as one was a key part of Brexit.
Comment
-
Well this is likely to end the EU as we know it.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-ukraine-china
Migration could be “a dissolving force for the European Union” due to deep cultural differences between European countries and their long-term inability to reach a common policy, the EU’s most senior diplomat has said."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
It was one of the agreed terms that stated the UK had to remain in the ECHR.Originally posted by vetran View Post
The good Friday agreement is to allow the UK to leave the EU and continued membership of the ECHR after we left the EU was an agreed term.
You are aware they are 47 members of the ECHR and only 27 EU members?
The ECHR isn't an EU institution unlike the European Court of Justice. (We have to stay in that under Brexit as well.)
You still haven't explained why the UK should leave an institution it was instrumental in forming.
Instead of shouting show me a link.Originally posted by vetran View Post
TO BE A MEMBER OF THE EU REQUIRES YOU TO BE A MEMBER OF ECHR - REPEATED LOUDER FOR THE HARD OF HEARING.
In your view.Originally posted by vetran View PostOn second point You know the EU isn't a country? The move towards wishing to be recognised as one was a key part of Brexit.
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
There is no deep misunderstanding between memberstates. There is systemic delusion among the EU elites.
Memberstates, as in the populace, are broadly in agreement. Immigration is OK if controlled. Mass uncontrolled immigration is not OK.
Fortunately for us, FPTP keeps extremists out of power. Same can't be said for PR in Europe and why you will start seeing more far right parties gaining power.Comment
-
This is the closest I could find - states which have become members since 1989 are expected to become parties to the ECHR as soon as possible, ideally within one yearOriginally posted by SueEllen View PostInstead of shouting show me a link.
https://web.archive.org/web/20100110...4/ERES1031.HTM
Of course that resolution is now almost 20 years old and things may have changed since then.Comment
-
It's Article 6 of the Treaty of Lisbon. It's got a bit of legalese barrier (due to EU law) but it does mean that ECHR membership is a condition of EU membership.Originally posted by Snooky View Post
This is the closest I could find - states which have become members since 1989 are expected to become parties to the ECHR as soon as possible, ideally within one year
https://web.archive.org/web/20100110...4/ERES1031.HTM
Of course that resolution is now almost 20 years old and things may have changed since then.Comment
-
Backed up by polling.Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
In your view.
https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/0...voted-and-why/
'Ever closer union' aka 'sovereignty' were the top 3 reasons for the leave vote.
Comment
-
yep saw that in the wail, resisted posting it as it would just result in a slanging match on here. But it seems the shine is coming off migration in the EU.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostWell this is likely to end the EU as we know it.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-ukraine-chinaComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment