Banned from FB

[tazdevil]

I hope no one tells you about the Muppet Christmas Carol, might just push your blood pressure over the edge.

The Muppet Christmas Carol is great and funny and doesn't pretend to be serious. I assume you appreciate the insidious destruction of your heritage

[WTFH]

The Muppet Christmas Carol is great and funny and doesn't pretend to be serious. I assume you appreciate the insidious destruction of your heritage

What precisely do you mean by "the insidious destruction of your heritage"?

Is this also "insidious destruction of heritage":

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03rzwgz

[vetran]

It's getting stupid with travesties such as the CH5 Anne Boleyn and BBC Great Expectations being deemed fine whilst being completely wrong but paintings by Stanley Spencer such as 'Love Among the Nations' branded racist and removed from view in case it offends. I watched the first episode of BBC Rain Dogs and lost 20 minutes of my life to blatantly offensive crap that was anything but funny. The Western World is heading down the toilet with the woke nonsense being foisted on us by manipulative fools

Rain dogs sounds like business as usual at the CBI!

This made me laugh waiting for the Beeb to add it to our schedules.

[vetran]

What precisely do you mean by "the insidious destruction of your heritage"?

Is this also "insidious destruction of heritage":

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03rzwgz

I couldn't be Hamlet because I'm Ginger!

Its new content that explores Shakespeare so no.

[WTFH]

I couldn't be Hamlet because I'm Ginger!

Its new content that explores Shakespeare so no.

And you're not Danish.

So, what is the "insidious destruction of your heritage" in Anne Boleyn and Great Expectations?

[vetran]

And you're not Danish.

So, what is the "insidious destruction of your heritage" in Anne Boleyn and Great Expectations?

And I'm not TazDevil. Do try to keep up grandad!

[WTFH]

And I'm not TazDevil. Do try to keep up grandad!

You replied that one link I sent was not "insidious destruction of your heritage", so why shy away from what is?
It's like you don't even read what you write.

[vetran]

You replied that one link I sent was not "insidious destruction of your heritage", so why shy away from what is.
It's like you don't even read what you write.

You asked a question about a specific scene, I pointed out it was exploring our heritage not replacing it.

You realise the redefining our history and literature to be more in line with modern opinions where various random ethnicities or opinions are smuggled into a time when such things did not exist is rather insidious.

[Gibbon]

I am banned from Twitter because I jokingly threatened to kill my mate.

That's because it's a blatant falsehood; you have no mates!

[d000hg]

Its a shame really but i guess thats how these things turn into echo chambers.

Well not really because actual hateful speech is frequently not removed. I have (rarely) reported things that seem genuinely bad and they never get removed.

It seems a total crapshoot.