• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

How will the rumoured pension allowance changes change your approach to contracting?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    I shall ask my IFA for independent financial advice.
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
      Approach to contracting, not remotely. Approach to pension savings, marginally (in the sense that, by contributing more, it helps to offset the increase in CT at the margins). However, watch out for more significant reforms to come, probably raising the age at which pensions can be accessed (currently due to increase to 57) and reducing the tax free lump sum from 25%. In other words, you may end up with a larger pot, but it may become less attractive in deferring tax because you cannot access it until much later and/or in a less tax-efficient way.
      An interesting detail from today. The maximum tax-free cash has been capped at 25% of the current lifetime allowance. That means they've effectively made the maximum tax free amount a fixed cash amount of a little more than £250k. That is going to get gradually eroded by inflation and it's going to look like a rather large "tax-free bung for rich people" for an incoming Labour gov't, to be reduced gradually. In other words, I think today we witnessed the death of the tax free amount.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

        An interesting detail from today. The maximum tax-free cash has been capped at 25% of the current lifetime allowance. That means they've effectively made the maximum tax free amount a fixed cash amount of a little more than £250k. That is going to get gradually eroded by inflation and it's going to look like a rather large "tax-free bung for rich people" for an incoming Labour gov't, to be reduced gradually. In other words, I think today we witnessed the death of the tax free amount.
        it will be eroded by inflation but can't be cut because that would lose any judicial review which would occur.
        merely at clientco for the entertainment

        Comment


          #14
          I don't have a pension, other than state, don't see the point. Would rather enjoy my money now, and my investment in increasing larger houses will probably be my pension.

          Comment


            #15
            I'm surprised no one is commenting on the 100k to 125k income tax bracket. This is where you effectively pay 65% tax on the 25k earnings over 100k due to the loss of personal allowance .

            Some people don't even know they pay 65% and think they are 45%.

            The only way for an inside IR35 person to avoid it is by contributing in to a personal pension so it keeps the taxable income below 100k. The increase 20k is very welcome for many and also helps to retain your tax free childcare as you also lose that at 100k plus.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by eek View Post

              it will be eroded by inflation but can't be cut because that would lose any judicial review which would occur.
              Would it? If parliament pass legislation to cut it, how would they lose a judicial review?

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by electronicfur View Post

                Would it? If parliament pass legislation to cut it, how would they lose a judicial review?
                A judicial review cannot overturn primary legislation, such as a Finance Act. Also, judicial reviews are about process not outcome.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

                  A judicial review cannot overturn primary legislation, such as a Finance Act. Also, judicial reviews are about process not outcome.
                  meh, but it won't happen,

                  Because financial products such as mortgages with pensions as the final repayment have been sold for decades... I can see the lifetime allowance been locked down to say £1.5m but the ability to extract 25% up to £250,000 or so as a lump sum will stay.
                  merely at clientco for the entertainment

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by eek View Post

                    meh, but it won't happen,

                    Because financial products such as mortgages with pensions as the final repayment have been sold for decades... I can see the lifetime allowance been locked down to say £1.5m but the ability to extract 25% up to £250,000 or so as a lump sum will stay.
                    We’ll see. Labour is already calling it a “bung for the rich” and promising to reverse the changes, which provides an ideal opportunity to do slightly more than reverse them, especially now that the maximum tax free amount is absolute, not relative (“250k bung to the rich”).

                    Comment


                      #20
                      I’ll be putting £180,000 instead of £160,000 into my SIPP this year.

                      With £20,000 in the ISA it barely leaves enough to live on. Must check if I qualify for any benefits.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X