• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The separate thread about how awful Queen Elizabeth was and the Royal Family is

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Oh, now this is inneresting...

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-62982315

    2 days after being at a funeral with 2,000 guests, at least one of them has tested positive.
    …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by Whorty View Post
      I'm another of those 'meh' when it comes to the actual royals in the royal family. Didn't watch any of the last week's who-har (watching a funeral when Rachel's is still so raw was not high on my list of activities).

      On balance I prefer that we have a monachy than not because of the income it brings in. They are net positive.

      But I also think they are no more than slaves ... well paid, well treated I grant you .... but slaves none-the-less. The top royals have very little freedom to do what they like unless like Harry they quit being a royal. Personally, even with all that perceived wealth, I'd never want to be a top royal. I like to do able to go to Asda in my onesie and slippers, and drink cider on the park bench, without fear that someone is going to pap me.
      I'm in this camp although we did watch the funeral and I do like a military procession. For me the net positive for the nation works (but the staunchly anti-monarchs won;t care about the loss of trade\income\jobs a lot of ordinary people will experience) and Whorty's last paragraph means I don't grudge them at all :-)

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by WTFH View Post
        Oh, now this is inneresting...

        https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-62982315

        2 days after being at a funeral with 2,000 guests, at least one of them has tested positive.
        No need to panic

        She is female, so while old shouldn't die.
        "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by gables View Post
          Whorty's last paragraph means I don't grudge them at all :-)
          Yeah. It's not a job, it's a life and I think in this day and age of choice and options Harry won't be the last to leave the system. I reckon it's going to be harder and harder to find someone that will live the life from cradle to grave and put the nation first(ish). Decisions over where they live, who the marry yadda yadda are going slip so it's all going to look very different in a generation or two.

          There is already news about slimming the coronation down and much more reform coming I reckon so hopefully a cheaper, slimmed down, more transparent system will emerge that might even start appealing to the anti establishment lot, BIDI.
          'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

            Yeah. It's not a job, it's a life and I think in this day and age of choice and options Harry won't be the last to leave the system. I reckon it's going to be harder and harder to find someone that will live the life from cradle to grave and put the nation first(ish). Decisions over where they live, who the marry yadda yadda are going slip so it's all going to look very different in a generation or two.

            There is already news about slimming the coronation down and much more reform coming I reckon so hopefully a cheaper, slimmed down, more transparent system will emerge that might even start appealing to the anti establishment lot, BIDI.
            IDI as well. Such people aren't actually anti-Monarchist, on the whole, more "Why them and not me"...

            As for leaving the system, most of the younger royals never joined and get on with their own lives already; the only real exceptions are Andrew's ninnies, who cling to their titles but contribute nothing obvious. The working Royals are already quite a limited bunch, basically Charles, Camilla and William's family.
            Blog? What blog...?

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by malvolio View Post

              IDI as well. Such people aren't actually anti-Monarchist, on the whole, more "Why them and not me"...
              Clearly you don't know any republicans. They aren't all poor.

              Originally posted by malvolio View Post
              As for leaving the system, most of the younger royals never joined and get on with their own lives already; the only real exceptions are Andrew's ninnies, who cling to their titles but contribute nothing obvious.
              They aren't senior working Royals.

              Also Charles' spare has done him a favour.

              Who did the right thing by f***ing off even though it upset certain parts of the British media. At least if we hear of him copying his eldest paternal uncle by mingling with the Fake Sheikh and other more unsavoury characters we will know they can't meet the King and UK ministers.


              Originally posted by malvolio View Post
              The working Royals are already quite a limited bunch, basically Charles, Camilla and William's family.
              The Prince Royal, Earl and Countess of Wessex are still senior working Royals.
              "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                Clearly you don't know any republicans. They aren't all poor.
                Not about wealth or lack of it, more about why should someone else have more privileges than me. And yes, I know a lot of republicans.


                They aren't senior working Royals.
                No, they aren't "working". Quite the opoosite. They still hang on to their "Senior Royal" titles and privileges though.

                Also Charles' spare has done him a favour.
                By doubling the workload of his brother? Yep, that helps...

                Who did the right thing by f***ing off even though it upset certain parts of the British media. At least if we hear of him copying his eldest paternal uncle by mingling with the Fake Sheikh and other more unsavoury characters we will know they can't meet the King and UK ministers.
                Andrew is a buffoon, and always has been. The epitome of unwarranted privilege. Harry's mistake was not impressing on Megan the difference between "Royal" and "Celeb", but prior to that he did do a lot of good things without much reward.



                The Prince Royal, Earl and Countess of Wessex are still senior working Royals.
                I assume you mean the Princess Royal, who does more than anyone. Edward and Sophie are also busy, in their own way. Andrew is out of the loop now, but was doing far more harm than good when he was "working" as the UK's trade envoy (aka flying at our expense to assorted international golf venues).
                Blog? What blog...?

                Comment

                Working...
                X