• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

RAF - ''offers to white men are paused to meet diversity targets"

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post

    Nope, they can't. There are a miriad of reasons why some won't make the grade. That shouldn't stop them from trying though.
    I agree but if they attempt to give everyone fair opportunity to try and they fail themselves then so be it. It's not a diversity problem based on anything holding a single race/gender or whatever back. Again, the RAF is way different than most jobs. Of the 14% of non whites a good majority either can't or won't apply anyway so attempting to get the people in teh RAF to meet national diversity targets is wholly wrong. That's the root of the problem IMO, the figures and targets, not the actual process itself.

    EDIT : I actually think having a look around the web my 'good majority' comment when talking about the 14% that don't want to join could actually be way off.

    Real life comments like...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	xxxxxx.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	111.7 KB
ID:	4230350
    Last edited by northernladuk; 18 August 2022, 13:01.
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by Whorty View Post

      You really are trying to spoil my day aren't you ..... I refuse to listen to you and your heretic falsehoods!
      Her children are cute -



      Edited to say - I think Jase's children are now teenagers.
      "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

        I agree but if they attempt to give everyone fair opportunity to try and they fail themselves then so be it. It's not a diversity problem based on anything holding a single race/gender or whatever back. Again, the RAF is way different than most jobs. Of the 14% of non whites a good majority either can't or won't apply anyway so attempting to get the people in teh RAF to meet national diversity targets is wholly wrong. That's the root of the problem IMO, the figures and targets, not the actual process itself.

        EDIT : I actually think having a look around the web my 'good majority' comment when talking about the 14% that don't want to join could actually be way off.

        Real life comments like...

        Click image for larger version

Name:	xxxxxx.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	111.7 KB
ID:	4230350
        Though to be fair having a few Muslims along might help in certain areas with intelligence and cultural knowledge. I am constantly learning about other cultures practices, much would be important in a war zone. I know if I were receiving Aid in Africa and was African it would be nice to see people with the same skin (yes its racist but hey we all are basically racist when scared).

        One does wonder if being an X first and a Brit second is a reasonable stance in war?

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by vetran View Post

          Though to be fair having a few Muslims along might help in certain areas with intelligence and cultural knowledge. I am constantly learning about other cultures practices, much would be important in a war zone. I know if I were receiving Aid in Africa and was African it would be nice to see people with the same skin (yes its racist but hey we all are basically racist when scared).

          One does wonder if being an X first and a Brit second is a reasonable stance in war?
          Hopefully the battlefield won't include Blackburn, Bolton or Accrington!

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by vetran View Post
            One does wonder if being an X first and a Brit second is a reasonable stance in war?
            I think you, and the Muslim guy in the screenshot make a very valid point. There's a difference between fighting a war to defend the country where you live against attacks on that country and being sent to somewhere else to fight a war that is political/ideology/financial.
            Some (Such as Bliar) will argue that the war in Iraq or Afghanistan was about defending Britain, but if it was, then we should have stayed until we won the peace, not just winning the war. Unfortunately, there is very little glory or financial gain to be made from peace, easier to pull troops out and leave the locals to rebuild.
            …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by WTFH View Post

              I think you, and the Muslim guy in the screenshot make a very valid point. There's a difference between fighting a war to defend the country where you live against attacks on that country and being sent to somewhere else to fight a war that is political/ideology/financial.
              Some (Such as Bliar) will argue that the war in Iraq or Afghanistan was about defending Britain, but if it was, then we should have stayed until we won the peace, not just winning the war. Unfortunately, there is very little glory or financial gain to be made from peace, easier to pull troops out and leave the locals to rebuild.
              Or as Biden/Bidden pull out and feck up 20 years of progress.

              Comment

              Working...
              X