International Womens Day

[SueEllen]

I must admit its difficult to ignore prominent camel toe in the supermarket. I suppose if I walked round in tights with a hard on I would probably get locked up.

Yes because that is offensive.

Simply walking or running around around with a prominent lunch box isn't a crime. \However that's why male runners/cyclists wear baggy shorts over their tights/leggings.

[d000hg]

Yes because that is offensive.

What's offensive about the natural beauty of a human body?

[SueEllen]

What's offensive about the natural beauty of a human body?

Some of the "natural beauty of a human body" stuff you can't display in public as it is regarded as offensive and you get locked up. Just ask the naked rambler. (I think he is no longer busy looking after his mother. )

[d000hg]

Some of the "natural beauty of a human body" stuff you can't display in public as it is regarded as offensive and you get locked up. Just ask the naked rambler. (I think he is no longer busy looking after his mother. )

So having a boner is offensive even if it's covered up? Or were you talking about CT?

[SueEllen]

So having a boner is offensive even if it's covered up? Or were you talking about CT?

Well this is the CPS guidance - https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidanc...cases-naturism

[Zigenare]

I acknowledge that women and men* are different from things you might find crawling under a rock.


* Most men.

Ah, stop your unsubtle trolling. Don't you know there's a war on? You could be put up against a wall and shot for bringing down morale. Go and have a shandy. It'll make you feel better.

JK Rowling suggests that Labour would like to rename it: "We Who Must Not Be Named Day".

I was merely asking the forum's "Instant Expert - Just add boiling water" what it was that she felt was an inequality that needed to be addressed that hasn't been already addressed.

As for bringing down morale, you should look a little closer to home.

[vetran]

If you put writing on your bum (or anywhere) then it's a bit daft to complain people are reading it. Likewise if you wear a very revealing outfit, getting angry about people looking at you. And no, I'm not arguing the "it's her fault she get's groped/cat-called/etc" there's a difference between looking and acting.

But don't worry, nobody can see your tiny bulge.

Yep I'm sure you are a bigger dick than me!

[vetran]

Yes because that is offensive.

Simply walking or running around around with a prominent lunch box isn't a crime. However that's why male runners/cyclists wear baggy shorts over their tights/leggings.

So if female displaying the exact shape of their genitalia by wearing skin conforming material is empowering and shows wimmin power yet males must hide theirs away because its offensive. I see the equality NOW.

[SueEllen]

So if female displaying the exact shape of their genitalia by wearing skin conforming material is empowering and shows wimmin power yet males must hide theirs away because its offensive. I see the equality NOW.

The men in leggings/tights don't have to hide they just choose to.

[quackhandle]

Apparently there is a twtter handle - @PayGapApp - that checks the gender pay gap and has pulled up a number of companies/organisations that tweeted about IWD, yet they have a 30-40% pay imbalance in favour of men.

Cue lots of quickly deleted or altered tweets.

qh