• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Prince Andrew update

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by AtW View Post

    A single photo with Epstein should have been enough
    Sadly far too many influential men have been photographed with Epstein some of them possibly kept their trousers on.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/b...ill-gates.html

    now did your Avatar dip his wick in underage / trafficked girls?
    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
      The BBC should book her to replace Sugar in the next series of The Apprentice
      One is fired?
      Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by vetran View Post
        Sadly far too many influential men have been photographed with Epstein some of them possibly kept their trousers on.
        If Maxwell talks (with copious secret video/photo evidence) plenty of them might lose their trousers

        Comment


          #14
          For some reason I keep calling him the "N**** of York" It is a civil case so it's only balance of probabilities.
          "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

          Comment


            #15
            Innteresting.....


            https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ilitary-titles

            The dramatic move comes hours after more than 150 military veterans wrote to the Queen to ask her to strip Andrew of his honorary military roles amid what they described as their “upset and anger”. The palace had said earlier on Thursday that it had no comment on their open letter.

            ....................

            The veterans say in their letter, which was partly coordinated by the campaign group Republic: “Officers of the British armed forces must adhere to the very highest standards of probity, honesty and honourable conduct.

            “These are standards which Prince Andrew has fallen well short of. It is hard not to see, when senior officers are reportedly describing him as ‘toxic’, that he has brought the services he is associated with into disrepute.

            “We are therefore asking that you take immediate steps to strip Prince Andrew of all his military ranks and titles and, if necessary, that he be dishonourably discharged.”

            The letter concludes with a pointed and personal request to the Queen, who has long been reported to regard Andrew as her “favourite” son. It states: “We understand that he is your son, but we write to you in your capacity as head of state and as commander-in-chief of the army, navy and air force. These steps could have been taken at any time in the past 11 years. Please do not leave it any longer.”
            "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by vetran View Post

              Sadly far too many influential men have been photographed with Epstein some of them possibly kept their trousers on.

              https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/b...ill-gates.html

              now did your Avatar dip his wick in underage / trafficked girls?
              It's a little bit more than that with randy Andy though, isn't it - the photograph of him with his arm around the waist of the lady in question, who he claims to have never met, being a good example.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by mattster View Post

                It's a little bit more than that with randy Andy though, isn't it - the photograph of him with his arm around the waist of the lady in question, who he claims to have never met, being a good example.
                yep that is quite damming. Though I suspect they will need to prove he knew that she was having sex under duress (if she did). That might prove quite difficult to prove without evidence of money changing hands.

                aTw is suggesting the bar is set at being photographed with Epstein. Even UK courts expect a bit more than that.
                Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                Comment


                  #18
                  He should have asked Johnson for advice. He'd know how to worm his way out of something like this.
                  Scoots still says that Apr 2020 didn't mark the start of a new stock bull market.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
                    If she'll do that to her son, imagine what she'll do to HMG PM...
                    Or even to a young princess...
                    "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by vetran View Post

                      yep that is quite damming. Though I suspect they will need to prove he knew that she was having sex under duress (if she did). That might prove quite difficult to prove without evidence of money changing hands.

                      aTw is suggesting the bar is set at being photographed with Epstein. Even UK courts expect a bit more than that.
                      Unfortunately for Andrew the other person in the photo is a sex trafficker. I think his chances are looking very bleak.
                      I'm alright Jack

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X