Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I refer the honourable member to my original comment - it's an out of date notion.
In the ancient context absolutely. Unfortunately in law it brings many advantages around old age and death. If you're not married then all sorts of crap can happen, such as inheritance tax and access to bank accounts, and if the deceased has children to previous relationships then NoK issues can writ large.
But even without those issues its life affirming that two people love each other so much that they are prepared to live in misery until death does them part
But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger
In the ancient context absolutely. Unfortunately in law it brings many advantages around old age and death. If you're not married then all sorts of crap can happen, such as inheritance tax and access to bank accounts, and if the deceased has children to previous relationships then NoK issues can writ large.
But even without those issues its life affirming that two people love each other so much that they are prepared to live in misery until death does them part
Well about 50% of them the others divorce and fight until they waste the inheritance.
If I ruled the world I would define rights based on children (DNA test required), separation and payment of child maintenance would be managed by flowcharts & administrators ruled by judges. Inventing abuse claims or trying for more than a fair share would be quickly stopped.
If you marry or cohabit with someone then you get out what you put in, if you don't contribute you don't get as much.
In the ancient context absolutely. Unfortunately in law it brings many advantages around old age and death. If you're not married then all sorts of crap can happen, such as inheritance tax and access to bank accounts, and if the deceased has children to previous relationships then NoK issues can writ large
Mrs W and I got married back in the day because it seemed the thing to do, but we talked about this later in life and said that really we'd have been just as content as a couple without the need to marry.
But, and as you say above, once Mrs W knew she was dying we'd have 100% got married as the whole IHT, probate etc is so outdated that it's necessary to be married to stop the Gov't taking 'their' pound of flesh. Grieving and having to deal with the loss of your partner is bad enough, but having to deal with everything as a non-married partner is added stress that no one wants.
But even without those issues its life affirming that two people love each other so much that they are prepared to live in misery until death does them part
Mrs W and I got married back in the day because it seemed the thing to do, but we talked about this later in life and said that really we'd have been just as content as a couple without the need to marry.
But, and as you say above, once Mrs W knew she was dying we'd have 100% got married as the whole IHT, probate etc is so outdated that it's necessary to be married to stop the Gov't taking 'their' pound of flesh. Grieving and having to deal with the loss of your partner is bad enough, but having to deal with everything as a non-married partner is added stress that no one wants.
Yes my father was glad he was married (as was I, otherwise I would really be a bastard!) when we lost my mother. He then a few years later lost his subsequent partner to cancer, the paperwork was a lot harder in the second case, if his partner's mother had not been alive it would have been near impossible.
Comment