• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.

Was there fraud in the US election?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
    That is just BBC news, any real documents of the actual investigations? Any documents on the dominion voting machine data investigation?
    There's this 124-page document: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/...5699.1.0_3.pdf

    It starts

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    US DOMINION, INC. ) 1201 18th Street, Suite 210 ) Denver, CO 80202, )
    ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC. ) 1201 18th Street, Suite 210 ) Denver, CO 80202, and ) ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION ) 1201 18th Street, Suite 210 )
    Denver, CO 80202,
    ) Case No.
    ) Plaintiffs, ) )
    v.
    ) ) SIDNEY POWELL ) 3831 Turtle Creek Boulevard, Unit 5B ) Dallas, TX 75219, ) ) SIDNEY POWELL, P.C. ) 2911 Turtle Creek Boulevard, #300 ) Dallas, TX 75219, and ) ) DEFENDING THE REPUBLIC, INC. ) 2911 Turtle Creek Boulevard #300 )
    Dallas, TX 75219, Defendants.
    ) ) )
    COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL


    1. This defamation action arises from statements made by Sidney Powell, who— acting in concert with allies and media outlets determined to promote a false preconceived narrative about the 2020 election—caused unprecedented harm. During a Washington, D.C. press conference, a Georgia political rally, and a media blitz, Powell falsely claimed that Dominion had rigged the election, that Dominion was created in Venezuela to rig elections for Hugo Chávez, and that Dominion bribed Georgia officials for a no-bid contract.

    2. Powell’s wild accusations are demonstrably false. Far from being created in
    Venezuela to rig elections for a now-deceased Venezuelan dictator, Dominion was founded in
    Toronto for the purpose of creating a fully auditable paper-based vote system that would empower
    people with disabilities to vote independently on verifiable paper ballots. As it grew, Dominion
    developed technology to solve many of the technical and voter intent issues that came to light as a
    result of the 2000 Presidential Election. Its systems are certified under standards promulgated by
    the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (“EAC”), reviewed and tested by independent testing
    laboratories accredited by the EAC, and were designed to be auditable and include a paper ballot backup to verify results.
    Since its founding, Dominion has been chosen by thousands of election officials throughout the United States to provide the technology to effectively administer transparent and fully auditable elections.

    3. Because of these safeguards, there are mountains of direct evidence that
    conclusively disprove Powell’s vote manipulation claims against Dominion—namely, the millions of paper ballots that were audited and recounted by bipartisan officials and volunteers in Georgia and other swing states, which confirmed that Dominion accurately counted votes on paper ballots.

    4. When respected Georgia Republicans disproved Powell’s false accusations by announcing that Georgia’s paper ballot recount had verified the accuracy of Dominion’s vote counts, Powell sought to discredit them by falsely accusing Dominion of paying kickbacks to them and their families in return for a no-bid contract. The only “evidence” Powell ever put forward to support that false accusation was a doctored certificate from the Georgia Secretary of State. Powell has insinuated that the fact that the certificate is undated is suspicious. In reality, the authentic certificate is dated and is publicly available on the Georgia Secretary of State’s website, along with public records showing there was a competitive bid process for the Georgia contract and that
    Dominion competed against Smartmatic and Election Systems & Software (“ES&S”).
    …You get the gist

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
      There's this 124-page document: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/...5699.1.0_3.pdf

      It starts



      …You get the gist
      Ha Ha. Grobbelar all over again.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
        That is just BBC news, any real documents of the actual investigations? Any documents on the dominion voting machine data investigation?
        Here he is saying the same thing reported by Associated Press from a direct interview.

        Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

        Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”
        That was December 1st 2020, so far they haven't found anything else either.
        "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

        Comment


          #34
          When people say "We have found no evidence..." it means one of two thing.
          1. We haven't looked
          2. We have looked, and we haven't found any evidence.

          In this instance, they have looked, and there isn't any evidence.

          The election wasn't rigged.
          The sky isn't falling.
          There is no conspiracy.

          HTH BIDI.
          Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

          Comment


            #35
            like i said, more succinctly - WALOOB.
            Entropy is NOT what it used to be.
            Inertia, however........................

            Comment


              #36
              I’ll withhold my judgement till ministroke posts about it

              Comment


                #37
                If your bank account was emptied fraudulently and you complained to the bank about it, if they then ‘investigated’ it and then reported to BBC that there was no fraud, would you accept that or demand to see the evidence of the investigation?

                That is precisely the problem here, Trump pissed off a lot of people including big tech and China and his own party people. They all colluded with each other and did a closed door ‘investigation’ into the fraud and decided that there was no evidence.
                Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !

                Comment


                  #38
                  ALOOB
                  Entropy is NOT what it used to be.
                  Inertia, however........................

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Trump and anyone who says the election was stolen is a lying infraction. HTH

                    Sent from my 5g carrier pigeon
                    Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      This CUK poll is a big fat lie - only sockies and anonymous posters voted No.

                      Says Hugebrain...
                      "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
                      - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X