• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Employee Coronavirus tests are deemed BIK

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Employee Coronavirus tests are deemed BIK

    Coronavirus: Workers to pay tax on tests by their employer - BBC News

    So we know what's going to happen if this stays, don't we?
    "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
    - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

    #2
    And private medical is BIKable

    Comment


      #3
      Pity that we don't have an equivalent "Marcus Rashford" figurehead to make the case for this being reversed?

      BTW - If anyone wants a test, you just register on the gov.uk website, book one and they are free. I get tested every 14 days (I have a vulnerable health condition, one of which symptoms manifest as a Covid symptom).
      I was an IPSE Consultative Council Member, until the BoD abolished it. I am not an IPSE Member, since they have no longer have any relevance to me, as an IT Contractor. Read my lips...I recommend QDOS for ALL your Insurance requirements (Contact me for a referral code).

      Comment


        #4
        Send a cheque to HMRC for the BIK amount, but cough over it first.

        Comment


          #5
          Treasury has gotta find cash for those loft insulation vouchers from somewhere...

          Comment


            #6
            Can't see this standing up to a challenge...firstly, if as a matter of occupational health an employee is required to have a regular test, then surely its a requirement of your employment and therefore not a BIK? There's already a precedent for this...employers can pay for eye tests for employees that use a display. I don't even think this will get as far as a challenge, I think the treasure will explicitly exempt it in tomorrow's statement.

            Outside of this scenario, sure, I see how it's a BIK, but since when did you need to pay for a test if you have symptoms? Why would you need your employer to pay it?

            Comment


              #7
              It's an example of typical dry British cough humour

              Comment


                #8
                You see what influence Cojak has! Scheme dropped.

                'Testing tax' dropped after backlash against charging workers in their salaries | Metro News
                bloggoth

                If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
                John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View Post
                  I don't even think this will get as far as a challenge, I think the treasury will explicitly exempt it in tomorrow's statement.
                  Called it.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Not completely, they are only stopping the tax for antigen tests, not antibody tests (it says in that article).
                    "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
                    - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X