Originally posted by ladymuck
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Employee Coronavirus tests are deemed BIK"
Collapse
-
Eh? You seem to be confusing antigen test (for current Covid-19 infection) and antibody (usually 28 days after infection took place).
-
I think it makes sense even if it is a bit squiffy. The antibody test is available for free so treating it as a BIK for someone who pays for it is unfair. Antigen tests are not available for free so everyone is in the same boat.
Leave a comment:
-
Not completely, they are only stopping the tax for antigen tests, not antibody tests (it says in that article).
Leave a comment:
-
Called it.Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostI don't even think this will get as far as a challenge, I think the treasury will explicitly exempt it in tomorrow's statement.
Leave a comment:
-
You see what influence Cojak has! Scheme dropped.
'Testing tax' dropped after backlash against charging workers in their salaries | Metro News
Leave a comment:
-
Can't see this standing up to a challenge...firstly, if as a matter of occupational health an employee is required to have a regular test, then surely its a requirement of your employment and therefore not a BIK? There's already a precedent for this...employers can pay for eye tests for employees that use a display. I don't even think this will get as far as a challenge, I think the treasure will explicitly exempt it in tomorrow's statement.
Outside of this scenario, sure, I see how it's a BIK, but since when did you need to pay for a test if you have symptoms? Why would you need your employer to pay it?
Leave a comment:
-
Treasury has gotta find cash for those loft insulation vouchers from somewhere...
Leave a comment:
-
Send a cheque to HMRC for the BIK amount, but cough over it first.
Leave a comment:
-
Pity that we don't have an equivalent "Marcus Rashford" figurehead to make the case for this being reversed?
BTW - If anyone wants a test, you just register on the gov.uk website, book one and they are free. I get tested every 14 days (I have a vulnerable health condition, one of which symptoms manifest as a Covid symptom).
Leave a comment:
-
Employee Coronavirus tests are deemed BIK
Coronavirus: Workers to pay tax on tests by their employer - BBC News
So we know what's going to happen if this stays, don't we?
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: