- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
worth a read
Collapse
X
-
"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell -
Originally posted by cojak View PostIf you did go that far I would say that you’re an idiot.
>30 years ago certain individuals were shut down when they raised concerns about an organised paedophile ring within politics, the BBC & the royal family & look how that turned out.
I believe that most of what's going on at world leader level is ultimately designed to control the population. If you don't believe we're being controlled then probably best you live in blissful ignorance.If you don't have anything nice to say, say it sarcasticallyComment
-
This is good: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...ona-simulator/England's greatest sailor since Nelson lost the armada.Comment
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostFor feck’s sake, look at the figures and do the math.
UK population- approx. 70 million.
Johnson et. al talking about Herd immunity of 60% - 42 million infected.
Of those 15% will be serious requiring medical intervention - 6.2 million.
Number of UK ICU beds per 100,000 - 6.6 (Germany has 29 and a lower death rate, quelle surprise...).
As a historical point, the UK death rate from Spanish flu was 0.5%. Using the potential infection rate above, that comes to...
210,000 (or more depending on that infection rate).
Thanks to An Engineer for setting this out for me - maths is what you need in these times.
Now, we can argue the accuracy of actual statistics compared with waffle from de Pfeffel.
Here's what we don't know:
1. How many are currently infected, but not tested (this would reduce the %)
2. How many have died untested (this would increase the %)
Now, some will argue that various countries are not reliable in their reporting. If the UK % is close to the global average, then that seems to indicate either we are fudging our data to match the average, or it's close to right.
Until someone can bring out data that can be proven to be more accurate, then that's the best we have.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by KinooOrKinog View PostYou're entitled to your opinion I suppose, but I question everything & I'm definitely not an idiot.
>30 years ago certain individuals were shut down when they raised concerns about an organised paedophile ring within politics, the BBC & the royal family & look how that turned out.
I believe that most of what's going on at world leader level is ultimately designed to control the population. If you don't believe we're being controlled then probably best you live in blissful ignorance.Comment
-
I suspect tomorrow's results for the UK will be 480-500 new cases.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostThe current global death rate is 3.9%. UK rate to yesterday is 3.6%. The global rate has been around 3.6% for the last 2 weeks.
Now, we can argue the accuracy of actual statistics compared with waffle from de Pfeffel.
Here's what we don't know:
1. How many are currently infected, but not tested (this would reduce the %)
2. How many have died untested (this would increase the %)
Now, some will argue that various countries are not reliable in their reporting. If the UK % is close to the global average, then that seems to indicate either we are fudging our data to match the average, or it's close to right.
Until someone can bring out data that can be proven to be more accurate, then that's the best we have.
Millions will die!
Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK ForumComment
-
Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post60-80 % of the UK population catching it and a 3.6% death rate.
Millions will die!…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Most who have died have had significant underlying illnesses. How many of these would have died anyway within the last few weeks? Did the virus really kill them, or were they already about to cark it?
As already said too, there will be multitudes who have the virus that have little to no symptoms and won't be caught in the stats. Thus the true death rate will be much lower than the 'official' rate.
I'm actually more concerned for the actions of the morons, stripping supermarket shelves and leaving nothing for those who only get to the shops once a week. These morons will do more harm to the vulnerable than the virus would have done had we all been more selfless.
But, humans are a selfish species; we're only concerned with ourselves and fook the restI am what I drink, and I'm a bitter manComment
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostIt kills mostly the old and the sick, you think the govt wants to close down something that solves the pension and health crisis in a matter of months?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Comment